BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Choose Your Opponents' Defensive Tactic

Choose Your Opponents' Defensive Tactic

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Ref

This Post:
00
191988.2 in reply to 191988.1
Date: 7/27/2011 4:25:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Lol
i went with fcp...

From: Thelonious

To: Ref
This Post:
00
191988.3 in reply to 191988.2
Date: 7/27/2011 5:19:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
I can't believe so few people voted for outside box and 1.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
191988.4 in reply to 191988.3
Date: 7/27/2011 6:02:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I can't believe so few people voted for outside box and 1.


i believe people areN#t sure about this tactics.

PS: i have very good experience with 2 of the 3 favourites when i play it ;)

This Post:
00
191988.5 in reply to 191988.4
Date: 7/27/2011 7:28:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Outside box and 1 is bad even against my team that relies on one player.

This Post:
00
191988.6 in reply to 191988.5
Date: 7/27/2011 7:29:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Works pretty well for me.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
From: Marot

This Post:
00
191988.7 in reply to 191988.1
Date: 7/27/2011 7:40:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Haha 2-3 for sure ;) ¡

PS: Btw it's a really nice add(the polls)

Last edited by Marot at 7/27/2011 7:41:35 PM

This Post:
00
191988.8 in reply to 191988.1
Date: 7/27/2011 7:44:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
For me it's obvious that FCP is the choice. The 2-3 gets a bad rep but it can work it certain situations. FCP almost never work unless you are playing a scrub team.

Check the Suggestions they are important
This Post:
11
191988.9 in reply to 191988.8
Date: 7/27/2011 10:21:19 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
2-3 zone absolutely kills a team's outside defense.. FCP is no where near that bad, at least ratings wise. even vs. look inside, it's intended target, 2-3 zone is often worse than M2M!

and 2-3 zone vs. an outside offense... game over 99% of the time.


This Post:
00
191988.10 in reply to 191988.9
Date: 7/27/2011 11:52:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Everything is worse than M2M IMO.

Secondly I don't agree. I think they both drop a base perimeter defense by about one. Except FCP is worse because it drops interior defense and rebounding while 2-3 boosts that latter two.

FCP does get you steals though...

This Post:
11
191988.11 in reply to 191988.9
Date: 7/28/2011 4:25:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
and 2-3 zone vs. an outside offense... game over 99% of the time.


Well if you have a shooting team, than yes. If you have a balanced team and they have really good outside defenders, then it's not 99%. Know that with 2-3 defense, you will get no offensive rebounds, so you rely on first attack only. This also mean the team playing 2-3 defense will have more possessions and if it's able to score better against you than you against him, they win.

If they have better rebounders than you and you play M2M or 3-2, they will get a lot of offensive rebounds and second chances and thus offsetting the advantage you have against their defense.

That's why I chose FCP, because I have a team with good offensive flow and especially Handling. Steals are not that much of a problem because I have a better defense than offense, so even if they have more possessions, they will not score more than me. Also my off.rebounds and their steals will probably cancel each other. FCP is a really horrid offense and worse than 2-3 in most cases.

This Post:
11
191988.12 in reply to 191988.3
Date: 7/28/2011 5:44:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I can't believe so few people voted for outside box and 1.


You mean that there are more options than just 3-2 and man to man.... wow - did I miss the announcement??!!

Advertisement