BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > SF training

SF training

Set priority
Show messages by
From: E.B.W.

To: Yuck
This Post:
00
242735.2 in reply to 242735.1
Date: 6/9/2013 8:29:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
I 100% agree. I'm training two SF's right now (Will probably be three next season), and they are a pain to train because their are no position trainings for SF. If this is added, it would be much easier and more fair in my opinion. Great Idea!

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
242735.4 in reply to 242735.3
Date: 6/9/2013 10:12:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
True, very true, but it does seem quite unfair that all the other positions can play their designated spot, or at least close to it (such as a PF in the center spot or a SG/PG in the other spot), pretty much right from the start and the SF has to be trained out of position until they are 25. You have to train them out of position for 7 seasons and can only use them in their designated spot for 5-7 seasons before you need to sell him/his skills are about to go down. Simply adding this, you would still be training him out of position for awhile, but I think by age 22-23 you can put him at the SF position and he can still be trained to the fullest.

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: Yuck

This Post:
00
242735.5 in reply to 242735.3
Date: 6/9/2013 11:09:31 PM
Cassville Yuck
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
553553
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
I totally understand what you are saying Manon. You and I have had very meaningful dialougue in the past. What I am proposing shouldn't make it infinitely easier to train a sf if the training percentages allotted are equivalent. The biggest pain is how the rest of your team is built for training a sf. Under current rules it benefits a team that already has a sf and not teams trying to build their first. If you already have a stud sf, it is much easier to train his replacement than it would be to start from scratch.

Last edited by Yuck at 6/9/2013 11:12:16 PM

From: Bballin

To: Yuck
This Post:
33
242735.6 in reply to 242735.1
Date: 6/10/2013 12:04:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
What if a one position training at the SF position trained something like 35% OD, 35% ID, 20% SB and 10% Cross training. That seems fair in my mind.

From: Yuck

This Post:
00
242735.7 in reply to 242735.6
Date: 6/10/2013 12:10:06 AM
Cassville Yuck
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
553553
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
That's pretty much what I had in mind. Maybe less on the secondary but either way, that's the idea.

From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
242735.8 in reply to 242735.6
Date: 6/10/2013 12:10:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
I would be okay with that, but 40% OD, 40% ID, 10% SB and 10% CT. What is it when you train pressure right now? Does 80% go to OD or is it less than that?

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: Flamen

To: Yuck
This Post:
00
242735.9 in reply to 242735.1
Date: 6/10/2013 7:56:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
It would be nice if and only if it was less efficient than training it separately.

Just like js for forwards is less efficient that training js for guards and inside shot separately.