BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > screwed
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
Draft: Looking for Ideas
70
player DEAD
7
Helping each other
10
GM benefits
4
screwed
38
Turnovers?
9
Game 3?!?
3
Rewards
6
Money ?!?!?!
6
Game Engine
5
Substitutions
9
Height
5
relegation
3
Game Ratings
6
dead transfer market
21
Arena-Changes
5
Assistance
1
Differentiation PG/SG and Cent...
2
New to BB Forums?
1
Countries
3
<
>
Favorite Folders
screwed
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
BB-Charles (1)
BB-Forrest (9)
Edju (4)
NRaider (3)
LCD316 (1)
brian (7)
raonne (1)
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor (11)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
NRaider
To:
BB-Charles
This Post:
0
268.3
in reply to
268.2
Date: 7/6/2007 6:01:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
can you make a "Kobe Tactic" Were you make one guy shoot 50% of your shots? I think that would be cool. Downside would he gets tired fast. So he might have a good first half, but 2nd half he starts to wear down.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
NRaider
This Post:
0
268.4
in reply to
268.1
Date: 7/6/2007 2:41:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303
I thought the game engine worked perfectly in the 1st round of the playoffs.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
NRaider
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
268.6
in reply to
268.4
Date: 7/6/2007 7:32:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
perfectly wrong. Everyon can tell i have the better team and ratings...only thing i can say now is, "Wait till next season" because i will take CUP and LEAGUE!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
NRaider
This Post:
0
268.7
in reply to
268.6
Date: 7/6/2007 8:14:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303
Do I detect a whiff of disrespect?
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
LCD316
To:
NRaider
This Post:
0
268.8
in reply to
268.6
Date: 7/8/2007 11:39:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
keep dreaming nic. im taking both next season. ive been playign around with my tactics of late, especially after puzzling losses
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
brian
To:
NRaider
This Post:
0
268.9
in reply to
268.6
Date: 7/9/2007 7:08:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
I with ya in the getting screwed department..
547079
Please tell me how I lost this match, and how those coaching ratings make any sense at all. Both playing "look inside", but I used the 2-3 zone compared to him using a 3-2 zone. Makes sense that that the 2-3 zone is the better coaching tactic against in inside offense, right? Nope, not in this match.
Completely baffled by the recent changes, going back to the original implementation of game engine 3.0
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
brian
To:
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor
This Post:
0
268.11
in reply to
268.10
Date: 7/9/2007 8:52:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
Seems BB-Charles explained the theory of the ratings pretty clearly:
"So, a great offensive coaching rating means that you got the most offensively out of what you have. It has nothing to do with the quality of your assistant coach and is entirely dependent upon the tactics you submit."
To me, this means the coaching rating is a reflection of the tactics I, the manager, chose before the match. If true, then the coaching ratings from my match make little to no sense based on the definition of those tactics from the rules.
On top of this, it's frustrating enough to have the effectiveness of the inside scoring tactic to have been seemingly erased with the new engine.
Edited 7/9/2007 9:46:54 PM by brianjames
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images