BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Selection of MVP

Selection of MVP

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
324.2 in reply to 324.1
Date: 7/18/2007 4:39:33 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
i am in the process of arguing with charles over this. I wholeheartly agree. He didn't take into account team record when doing the mvp. He also did do something that is most like most valuable player to his team. the truth is that MVP is a bit of a misnomer. What we really mean is Most Outstanding Player Whose Team Did Well. but MOPWTDW doesn't really roll off the tongue.

so please everyone make a stink so i can prove charles wrong. I love when that happens.


Edited 7/18/2007 4:40:18 AM by BB-Forrest

From: Vikman
This Post:
00
324.3 in reply to 324.2
Date: 7/18/2007 6:12:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
MVP voting for my division went pretty well. Everyone besides one player was from the top 4 teams.

From: jbmcrock

This Post:
00
324.4 in reply to 324.3
Date: 7/18/2007 3:13:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Apparently the Canadian sportswriters aren't as well informed. 7 out of the top 10 were from non-playoff teams.

This Post:
00
324.5 in reply to 324.4
Date: 7/18/2007 4:11:41 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I think charles has simply overweighted the MOST in valuable player. He's overvaluing the fact that those players were head and shoulders above other players on that same team. Of course worse teams are going to have a larger gap between the best and the average players on the team.

This Post:
00
324.6 in reply to 324.5
Date: 7/18/2007 7:06:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
The guy who won it in II.1 sucked ass. I think he averages 15ppg, and 5 rpg. Not close to most of the other top players in the series.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone