BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Let Us Bid into Debt

Let Us Bid into Debt

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
7117.2 in reply to 7117.1
Date: 11/14/2007 1:44:03 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
i would argue to takes more strategy to manage a fixed budget than to manage a soft one. If you don't have to think about it you can just spend more money, in your case you got penalized for not thinking ahead.. and really its an arbitrary line... so we move the line back a little bit the same fundamental problem will still exist... if i had just 1 dollar more I could have bid on this guy.. etc. etc. So although i understand your frustration, I think you agree there must be a line, and any arbitrary line is going fundamentally to have the same property that frustrated you in the first place. Essentially allowing debt simply resets what having zero dollars means.

This Post:
00
7117.3 in reply to 7117.1
Date: 11/14/2007 10:37:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
I will not agree with you. Doing so will give cheaters a huge opportunity of just creating a second/ third team and sell their players for huge amounts, making the lives of the BB's unbearable with all the reporting of cheating going around...

This Post:
00
7117.4 in reply to 7117.3
Date: 11/15/2007 1:20:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't agree that users should be able to bid into debt.

Why are people so pr e-occupied with spending money they simply don't have? If you want a player, save the mone y and *then* buy them.
Overstretching (or rather, allowing the possibility to overstretch) can only lead to bad things if we look at the game overall from a global perspe ctive.

EDIT - strange bug? spaces keep appearing wherever the letter "e" is typed...
[br ]Edited by rlinney2001 (15/11/2007 13:21:26 CET)

Last edited by LA-rlinney2001 at 11/15/2007 1:21:26 PM