BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Slasher.

Slasher.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
164855.20 in reply to 164855.19
Date: 11/28/2010 11:38:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
The point is that you need A LOT of passing to be successful in a inside tactic. IF you build a PG with 15 JS and 18/19 Passing he would be worthless in other tactics because his JS is too low. You can't build a 300k player just to be suitable for one tactic because you will be out of offensive options. Maybe you look at a PG with 20 passing and 5 JS, god's gift to look inside but he is a terrible player.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
164855.21 in reply to 164855.20
Date: 11/28/2010 12:40:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I'm glad we can have a conversation without the obbligatory "then talk to me" at the end

I understand where you're coming from and I agree with you to some point. You can't put a 15 JS and 20 PA player on PG with Motion or Run and Gun. One way to handle it is to put such player at SF in Outside tactic, but maybe this is not an ideal solution.

Ideally I'd want to see 2-3 pops more in JR for Bronson, so he could be a shooting-oriented PG who can also pass. My preference though is a pure passing PG who can occasionaly shoot when required and has very high Driving and free throws so he can draw fouls.

So maybe a PG with more PA than JS would be more suitable for those two LI games of USA. Personally, I'm in favour of putting two PGs in PG and SG spot when playing LI, but maybe USA manager has different ideas.

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
164855.22 in reply to 164855.21
Date: 11/28/2010 1:54:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Those 3 pops in JR would cost him 50k more... that's a lot! Barely any team can support a 300k player having profit and a balanced team. It probably would be more suitable more passing but even if his passing was 20 he would still shoot and miss a lot because that is just how it works, the other teams have defense too and isn't possible to pass everytime.

I don't like having 2 PG's playing Look Inside because of the reasons that I've stated before and I would rather have a PG playing in the SF postion with some passing and Inside Shooting.

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
164855.24 in reply to 164855.23
Date: 11/28/2010 3:18:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
There aren't those kind of SF for all the teams in the world. Despite not knowing his skills of course i would prefer having Kiebink but a good alternative would be having a PG to help with the passing.

From: iwen

This Post:
00
164855.25 in reply to 164855.19
Date: 11/28/2010 3:42:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and nothing I say can change your mind, nor can you change mine.

Those opinions of Bronson can be so easily manipulated because if he had 15 assists, which is entirely possible if his teammates finished their looks, the argument would be invalid. If the Australian defense wasn't as good as it was, he wouldn't be driving for a shot. There are so many hidden variables as to why he took the shot to end up with his shooting statistics. Maybe he received the ball towards te end of the shot clock and had to throw it up? See what I mean?

I will say though, I have trained 2 NT level players, so I do have a lot of experience with training high level players. But I'd never require a player over 150k salary. But nobody will ever require a PG will over 17 passing.. The return just isn't worth it.

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
164855.27 in reply to 164855.26
Date: 11/28/2010 4:20:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Well I wouldn't spend 209k in a player with that JS and JR and that defense.

From: iwen

This Post:
00
164855.28 in reply to 164855.26
Date: 11/28/2010 4:59:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
But with that OD, and shooting, he's a liability.

Why have 25 PA when he would move some of those skill points to JS or OD?


Advertisement