BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Franchise Player

Franchise Player

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
214067.20 in reply to 214067.19
Date: 4/9/2012 4:26:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Passing is virtually untrainable for a tall player in this game.

There is the slow training speed, he has to play out of position and more often than not the starting skill is so bad that it would take you seasons of training to reach a decent level. If a C comes with a 7 in passing I will gladly take it, but I would never waste my time to train that skill.

This Post:
00
214067.22 in reply to 214067.21
Date: 4/9/2012 4:48:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
That sounds unrealistic to me. A 25yo 7'4 C would get a pop in passing every three weeks? I doubt it.

Even if it was that fast, there is still the issue of out of position playing. Then you want some JR, OD, HA, DR and JS on top of it... impossible if you dont start with a balance rookie.

This Post:
00
214067.24 in reply to 214067.22
Date: 4/9/2012 4:56:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Then you want some JR, OD, HA, DR and JS on top of it... impossible if you dont start with a balance rookie.


I don't think "impossible" is the word you're looking for. Maybe difficult or inconvenient or unconventional, perhaps?

This Post:
00
214067.25 in reply to 214067.23
Date: 4/9/2012 5:00:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Nothing is impossible. But you will have to make sacrifices. If your not go out on the TL and buy one instead. There is always an option open for you.

18-28yo 7'0-7'4 PA in PG position gives a 0.42 increase in skill.
Pressure for PG: 0.24
JS for forwards : 0.16

I bought a pretty good trainee this season and i am starting with his outside skills as he is pretty bad on both ends. 48 mins in scrimmages dont cost me that much tbh.
Do you actually think that a 18YO player is trained the same as a 28YO. Seriously?

This Post:
00
214067.27 in reply to 214067.23
Date: 4/9/2012 5:19:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Nothing is impossible. But you will have to make sacrifices. If your not go out on the TL and buy one instead. There is always an option open for you.

18-28yo 7'0-7'4 PA in PG position gives a 0.42 increase in skill.
Pressure for PG: 0.24
JS for forwards : 0.16

I bought a pretty good trainee this season and i am starting with his outside skills as he is pretty bad on both ends. 48 mins in scrimmages dont cost me that much tbh.
Above, Manon argued that 18-28YO 7"4 in PG will increase is passing skill by 0.42.
Then after confronting him with facts, he changed his claim.
Did you noticed that?
I hope you understand that it cannot be true that a 18YO will be as easy to train as a 25YO and surely not 28YO.

This Post:
00
214067.28 in reply to 214067.26
Date: 4/9/2012 5:21:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
id have no problem to traing bigmen in outside skills.. i posted some lovley players already.. 500k and 2-3 seasons of outside training and they belong to the nicest players all over bb. but the problem is theyve been monoskilled first because thats what the NT wants.. and i dont want to pay 200k a week to improve a center in outside skills so theyll always stay raw players with wasted talent hopping from team to team.

i agree that the formula is what has to be changed. they shouldnt earn more than the best team can afford.. in the nba you cannot have 5 max contracts and thats fine.. but you would wanna have at least 2. so make the max salary something like 250k for centers aswell as for guards and forwards.

maybe youve already taken care of that by changing the training speed.. we will see in a few seasons but until then please adept the 350-400k contracts.. they are the best players right now in the game and nobody wants em?


This Post:
00
214067.29 in reply to 214067.28
Date: 4/9/2012 5:26:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I think that maybe if one could choose his secondary training skill that would have been changed.
Maybe then users will try to use the secondary skill for some not-traditional skill more often.

Advertisement