BuzzerBeater Forums

Without this tax some teams could "buy championships" with those cheap national team players, which would be all too easy solution.


If this is your wrong. If a manager buy 5, 18 yrs and build them and win 5 league title then another and another and another and another every year. He has still bought a championship?

Its a manager's game your suppose to buy the championship through your wages, training is a option ,not by all mean for all ways . In small you just said the guys and great teams of the past of bb are not legit champions. they are asterik.

Training don't win champions for everybody on BB. Who care if they have 5 nt players and bought them, theres 5 players that never made NT that are better on the game, I had guy in my league with 2 of them. Basketball is not mean to be fair.

Adapt . its not about adapting. it about taking away a hand. Everyone invested In that hand and way of play. I invested milions in that hand. When did BB give me a dime of my investment back? I invested at my own risk. Some would call that a sham to switch a man investment to another way..

How would you like someone to take away your million dollar investment and tell you build another and adapt. Then you sell that investment at a lost and never recoup what you lost in product. I had salary to hold my player, then all the dumb taxes. My ball club had the salary to hold now all of sudden because such and such league is important and I haven't trained them, I cant have it, I already done damn well bought them.. I bought those player through hand work and grind, honestly play..

Its wrong and it a under cut cheap way to cheat others out a good game because the skill a manager lack. Because they don't know how to do financial reconstruction of their ball clubs. Trianing is to afford is bull.. who care if a manager has 5 nt player. There are 5 player that never made a nt would can beat them in a game.

Not all manager should playing the training game. If it about a building team in many forms then why take away that hand to do so. Did a lot not earn the money honestly. Its our team if we have the bank account then how is it not fair to the guy who train 18 yr to beast and make million selling him. its even the odds versus him. Its suppose to be free market.! free enterprise. Not seller market for trainers. It supply and demand for tactics and team style of play, not demand huge prices from what you trained.. last part is the case then who is going to buy that beast. why I cant that beast.? oh because of low league and I haven't trained him. want to win right now. Why take away that hand to win right now. MY point. Adapting is winning right now for me ,not waiting to win tommarrow. If your sick you don't wait for medince 2 weeks from now at the doctors. You want them right now, you invested in the medical insurance and you want your health better that day . you will how can get better right

What about win right now !!.. A small cold shouldn't be treated a colon cancer surgery. waiting to get well, My point

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 9/25/2014 7:42:38 PM

you cannot spend more than you earn without paying taxes_



My reply-For a sports team you will always spend more than you earned to run the team. In real life you spend more than you earn, think about all the money some give you that you didn't work for? You didn't pay taxes on that money given to you by free will. Just because you over spent for a player don't mean you don't have money to afford him. If this was the case no manager could buy a player on BB.. because no team finances are the same .season to season this why their is bank account to hold the cost. why tax some bank account to hold a cost. they already paid bidding then salary? then money out the bank account. 3payments, a tax is the 4th

I feel like this instead of add sum dumb tax. why not make it so a team cant have 5 nt players. 1-2 max. Why didn't they do that.? The economy is not is good today. Far from it... The reward is the same if you bought or trained for it. why would some value a person who trained for something than a person who good at putting things together and win. The title is still the same goal. If someone has the money and the other has the skill who has the advantage.?? The skill full will always has have the advantage. The one who can spend and build to even the odds is the deal breaker. If none is there to out spend him. How can you beat him? MY point.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 9/25/2014 8:19:35 PM

I know why it's dying. Because of stupid little things that are not yet fixed but instead million new mostly useless features are introduced. Like utopia, like "achievements" which you'll look at once in million seasons, not solving overpowered look inside with that ridiculous and useless tactic prediction, league table not updated for 6-7 hours after the game, fan survey STILL broken (yea, it is) etc.

Should I mention that training is late - AGAIN? For the fking 1435614631346. time....

just wanted to say: i gave you a +1 only because i was pissed about the Training. i don't agree on the other things really.

like this one:

not solving overpowered look inside with that ridiculous and useless tactic prediction

Hehe, ok, maybe prediction is of some use but LI is still overpowered but that's offtopic. Noone is scared of Motion for example - never ;)

And reason for LI dominance is more salary efficient players.
- pg,sg,sf with high od, driving, jump range and inside shots
If you try to build outside oriented team, it will cost salary wise way more at least if you would like to get similar FG% than in LI.

That's not completely true:

12 8
10 12
12 9
6 18
16 11

Perfect PF for outside tactics, costs only 66k (perfectly viable for every II team), needs Superstar potential only, defends every single LI guy and can score a lot. Skills may vary if you want more or less salary.