BuzzerBeater Forums

Outstanding players but affordable players, by anyone. Affordable players, 95%+ of the market.

Which centers ? The freaks or the sustainable ones ?
How much is next to nothing ? Is more than a million next to nothing ? You simply don't know or don't remember how much is worth a million for 95% of the users.

The market for 200k centers is small, only D.I teams can afford them. How many 200k centers and how many teams with the desire and the finances to have one ? I don't know the actual numbers but from the looks of it, these centers are flooding the market.
The freaks are another completely different issue.
Hundreds of users scan and scrutinize the TL daily. If you can't sell a high wage player it's because he is not desirable for that price at the present time. You can trust the market on that one.

And salary is an important part of the deal, look, when you replace your trainer, you are willing to bid higher for a lower wage trainer because you have worked out you save money in the long term.
Higher wages don't mean automatic higher bids for players. And that's without even starting to discuss skill values.

If the market for 200k centers is small, whats with the market for 200k guards? Bigger, smaller or same size? Why are those players much more expensive? Sustainability is the same problem for those guys, innit?

Market or centers is vey large but the are very expensive beacuse centers are very easy to train as they need less training only 4 parts (Reb, ID, SB, IS) thats why they get high salary and managers put them on TL on high amount. But market for good guards is smaller then centers but yes they are not much expensive like centers.

If the market for 200k centers is small, whats with the market for 200k guards? Bigger, smaller or same size? Why are those players much more expensive? Sustainability is the same problem for those guys, innit?

Because number of Centers with big salary is higher than number of Guards.
Market for 200k+ Centers and 200k+ Guards is the same. But different is number of players on these positions.
In game we have on every position following number of players with salary over 200k:
33 x PG
47 x SG
1 x SF
25 x PF
332 x C
Demand is the same but supply of C is 10 twice higher than supply of PG. And we see simple mechanism of demand and supply.
And multiskilled PFs (and Cs too), with salary over 200k but with sum of 10 basic skills over 110 are expensive on TL the same as Guards.

Last edited by B.B.King at 8/12/2011 6:56:08 PM

Demand is the same but supply of C is 10 twice higher than supply of PG. And we see simple mechanism of demand and supply.

Thats what I am saying all the time. And how come the amount of centers is 10 times bigger? I bet one of the reasons are those free agents that flood the market for seasons now, somebody should have monitored the amount of those players...

Did a little checking. How many centers above 150k/wk on the market right now are free agents? 0 out of 66. So while there might possibly be some tenuous link between free agents and plethora of expensive big men, I don't see it. It is because centers are easiest to train, and your average internet user likes easy things. Besides which, he doesn't understand about cost-effectiveness, just that a guy with three gold or green skills is gonna whip ass in his d.3 league. Then when the salary update comes around he sees that he can't afford that guy anymore so he sells him and starts another.

How do you get those numbers ?

And a third rain shower of facts for good measure.
Searching the TL for 200k+ salary players.
Found 40 players.
2 PG, 3 SG, 2 PF, 33 C.

It's biased because Cs salary raise faster but it remains there is an oversupply of this particular type of player hence why they go for cheap.

How do you get those numbers ?

It's long story... What do You know about midi-chlorians?
In last two season I used few players with salary over 200k and played against most of them, so it was my job and I had to know it.

Midi what ? :))) I know nothing about it, it sounds like something contagious, I am not sure I want to know ;)

So I guess it's private data, I thought it might be public :)