BuzzerBeater Forums

Why would they get an incentive? That's silly. A starting team doesn't have the option to just "play with the big boys" straight away. They have to earn that right, by learning and using their learning effectively.

Sorry, not every country has 4 divisions. Last season there were 2 or 3 new users who ended up in my league. And I don't think I see to tell you the rest of the story.

Even if there is one division, the manager who makes the best decisions will eventually end up on top. It's not going to happen straight away, but it'll eventually happen. This game isn't necessarily like those kind of games where you always get to win, no matter how crappy you are. Many console games are like that and I think they're bad for people's personalities.

I win, every time!!!

No, I just make good decisions.

There's one thing I think we can agree on:

The game should be more about tactics.

I agree with you on that,it only deepen the distance between clubs...this is why i suggested to make the stuff take % from the income that way 5division and 1 division clubs will have more fair chance to be equal one day.

And the current system is so idiotic...i cant understand ignoring reality a little or more...but it's totaly ignored here.
The old system is still better then the current one so why protect this so called "improvment"? it's not a "Challenge" it just make you angry and waste money that you need.Show me one club that change it's entire stuff each season! in my country tea, doctors can be with thier team for more then 20 years...it's very rare to see one replaced,becouse there is no need for that,when it happens it's the doctors call almost all the time(or late age).

How ridiculous it sound to hear a story on a staff memeber get a firing notice because "his salsaty went up too fast each week in real life people dont get a yealy wage raise each year but in BB! the game that declare it's realistic they get a weekly increase no matter if they are the best(lvl 7)or the worst(lvl 1),we can all just wish we were BB doctors PR managers or trainers...best job in the world.Still ask why to change this so called "working" system?

Last edited by Doctor J at 9/24/2012 1:59:06 AM

I fail to see any points backing up "the old system is still better than the current one."
Mind giving us some?

What´s better in having a coach who is listed at level 10 and which performs like level 3 without you having ANY accessible data about his current level of skills?

Last edited by LA-seelenjaeger at 9/24/2012 2:44:57 AM

What is good in the currenct system? nothing!

I already told that the old let top team and noob team same chance and tools why do you ignore that?
Also ingoring the weekly raise the is simply ridiculous...you know what? just read the last post again because if you ask for points yu either didnt read it or totaly ignored what is written there.

Good in the current system?

You know what you guy is doing. You know his price. You can tell by the ratio between KNOWN skill and KNOWN price whether you want to afford that or not, as you KNOW the price to change this by accessing the bidding site for coaches of similar skills / similar cost. You even know what he will cost tomorrow, in a week, a month, a year if you want to.

It´s a equation between performance, need and cost. That´s what managing is about, isn´t it?

The old system had a big load of intangibles - how good is he, what will he actually perform like...

And the proposed change towards ONE change in salary would lead to an highly instable and unpredictable market, as it would create some 10k teams needing a new staff member within 10 days. So the bidding war would most likely go through the roof in the first weeks of the season.

The current system is balanced. And if you look at the staff member as a free lancer with an initial sign up fee before the first session it´s not that far off reality as you might think.