BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New DT limitation

New DT limitation

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Milly

This Post:
00
31047.21 in reply to 31047.11
Date: 5/15/2008 11:52:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
New rules suck ... Drop the salaries then if u want make those horrible rules. Or figure other way to solve this problem!
Is it normal to sell and buy players every week? Is that a part of the game? I did not know that.
There is a football game named (http://www.dugout-online.com) dugout-online where you have to own a player in 10 weeks before you are able to sell him. Before that it isn't possible to put him on the market. I do think that makes "day-trading" very slow. Maybe such an idea works better here as well?

Older than the rest ...
From: CitB
This Post:
00
31047.22 in reply to 31047.20
Date: 5/15/2008 11:52:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
i still dont have a clue what penalties im facing...

From: Iordanou

To: CitB
This Post:
00
31047.23 in reply to 31047.22
Date: 5/15/2008 12:04:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I know that I will never figure out from my team:D

This Post:
00
31047.24 in reply to 31047.11
Date: 5/15/2008 12:09:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
New rules suck because i get -170 000 $ every week if i don't have the home game in same week. Where i can get money?? Drop the salaries then if u want make those horrible rules. Or figure other way to solve this problem!


You get home games virtually every week.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
31047.26 in reply to 31047.18
Date: 5/15/2008 12:45:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Can anyone point me to a team that is currently a DT?

Currently and currently ... some have a position as a consequence of DT.
There has been teams like (41703) that has made a strong roster from day-trading (and others like (99007)). But lately they have slowed down. The Österreich team is the winner of the Bundesliga last season and you can of course ask your self if that's because of DT?

Older than the rest ...
This Post:
00
31047.27 in reply to 31047.25
Date: 5/15/2008 12:46:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
However, for a team that has made, say, 15 sales in the last season, the sales tax might instead range from 4.5% to 30%.


first thx for the answer, it really helps us planing the season.

Nevertheless why are u saying "say 15 sales" and "migh tinstead range". Are those numbers not always the same or dont you know the exact numbers. i believe this is something which is stated in the news and in the rules.

This Post:
00
31047.28 in reply to 31047.14
Date: 5/15/2008 12:48:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225

Lets say I train PF. I sell 2 of them each season and buy 2 trainees to replace them. With the money earned I do upgrade my team e.g. 1 PG, 1 SG, 1 SF and 1 C and I also sell 1 of my former player for each position. This makes a total of 12 trades. Then may be I am going to be punished by the game engine and have 3 times 8 weeks of injury. For not being demoted I will have to replace them which will make 6 more trades (3 sales and 3 buys). I do have already 18 trades within 14 weeks without being a DT at all. So please my friendly BB-staff be somehow generous when interpreting “a couple of trades in the past 14 weeks”.


Dont forget to factor in the GS drops as well... and the fan loss when selling players...


There is something people don't consider here: first, the agent fee is really large if you resell quickly. 20%. If you have high turnover and you sell quickly, this is deadly for your income.

On the other hand, if you sell players that have been on your roster for a while, the agent fee will be, say, 10% or even as little as 5%. Even if you have a bit of transfers over the course of the season, you will still retain more money. This is where the major difference in income between traders and non-traders will come from.

This being said, I am iffy on the new changes. I am starting to feel like we're trying to kill a fly with a cannon here.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 5/15/2008 12:50:19 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
31047.29 in reply to 31047.11
Date: 5/15/2008 5:47:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
Drop the salaries then if u want make those horrible rules.

Dropping the salaries wouldn't solve the problem. Then you would just get better players in your roster and so on...

This Post:
00
31047.30 in reply to 31047.26
Date: 5/15/2008 7:28:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Can anyone point me to a team that is currently a DT?

Currently and currently ... some have a position as a consequence of DT.
There has been teams like (41703) that has made a strong roster from day-trading (and others like (99007)). But lately they have slowed down. The Österreich team is the winner of the Bundesliga last season and you can of course ask your self if that's because of DT?



Thats my point - that was THEN - when taxes were introduced and now the GS drop that seemed to do the job of deterring DT's. This new rule IMO is not necessary because there arent any (many) DT's still about...

Your 2 examples have made 3 transfers between them in May!

The people complaining are those that just judge a managers transfer history and see loads going on Nov-Feb/Mar.....

From: Jward
This Post:
00
31047.31 in reply to 31047.30
Date: 5/15/2008 9:40:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I am not really following what is really implemented, excuse my English.
Can anyone confirm this?

Starting this monday, the more transfers you make, the more tax you will pay for selling players.
Also starting from today, the number of transactions etc. will affect the previously announced GS and fan base stuff. (and we don't know the extent of the effect on fan base. i.e. how many transactions would hurt, selling which player would hurt etc.)

Anything wrong here? Thanks for clarifying

Advertisement