BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > All-Star Votes?

All-Star Votes?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
66644.22 in reply to 66644.21
Date: 1/4/2009 4:52:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
So than I guess all this translates down to one thing...

Do you want a proper training regime or do you want to try and win all the time giving your star players top minutes and sacrificing training to a degree.

It seems the way that the current all-star lineups are generated, a team that is focusing hard on training a group of players will not have their players present in the AS game even if they are better than the ones chosen. It seems that presently the all-star game rewards managers that don't work as hard at training, game shape etc... instead the teams that put out the same lineup evey game.

Obviously, they still have to put in the stats and performance, which is kind of challenging with low gameshape, and lack of money for roster upgrades.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
66644.23 in reply to 66644.22
Date: 1/4/2009 5:37:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
In general most teams in the NBA and BB give their star players the most minutes. The teams that don´t for whatever reason and whether it hurts their team or not (this is not relevant to whether a player made it in the BB play offs and what this thread is all about), shouldn´t be suprised that the fans (who vote for the all star team) know little about players that play less minutes and therefore don´t get picked.

The NBA all star vote is not only a pick who is the best player, unfortunatelly it is also a pick who is most favorite under the fans... Again, cant be known and therefore favorite among the fans if you play little or less than other players...

ps my players didnt get picked because they didnt play enough. either i play them more or accept they wont get picked. this counts for the other managers as well, whos better players missed out...

Last edited by Astragoth at 1/4/2009 5:38:49 AM

This Post:
00
66644.24 in reply to 66644.23
Date: 1/4/2009 7:17:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
If what you say it is right, that I do not doubt at all, how come the 3rd Shooting guard in votes in my league (4208507) , has only played 2 games with my team as I signed him very recently, and he almost made it to the All Star Game.

Any ideas anyone?

PS. The second most voted shooting guard (4556524) is from my team as well, it may have had something to do with that?

This Post:
00
66644.25 in reply to 66644.24
Date: 1/4/2009 7:49:05 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
i mean he is 3rd, but a distant distant third.

This Post:
00
66644.26 in reply to 66644.25
Date: 1/4/2009 9:17:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
I'm kinda surprised to see that the winner of last seasons 3point contest may not even defend his title.

But ok, his .37 3FG% would be just to low to enter it I guess.

This Post:
00
66644.27 in reply to 66644.24
Date: 1/4/2009 9:44:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
lol i am sure the formula to pick all star players doesnt take into count in which league he made minutes. your guy played a lot this season (maybe not in your league but he did) and that is why he was picked...

This Post:
00
66644.28 in reply to 66644.27
Date: 1/4/2009 9:47:43 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
might i add that having all star voting without controversy would not only be unrealistic, but probably not any fun ;)


This Post:
00
66644.29 in reply to 66644.13
Date: 1/4/2009 9:51:08 AM
MightyMice
IV.37
Overall Posts Rated:
494494
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
I am a bit frustrated about nominations. Yes, my turnover is quite high and there is not as much exposure as other teams. I am currently first in my conference, with highest rank in 3-points shooter and in per-game evaluation, and finally my SF is ranked among top tens in PPG and top-15 in RPG (and this SF played all but one or two games).

No nomination at all... And in my conference's team I noticed a player of a bot ("fedelissimi"), now re-assigned to human.

This Post:
00
66644.30 in reply to 66644.29
Date: 1/4/2009 10:12:57 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
so i looked at your players, i dont think you have much of a case for your player
first i will point out that your player did get a nomination, he was 3rd in voting.

second, look at the stats..

the leading vote getter
21 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.9 SPG, 47% from the field
also on a team with the same record

the second place vote getter..
19.8 PPG, 10.8 RPG, 1.2 SPG 44% from the field

and finally your player
15.6 PPG, 8.7 RPG, 1 SPG 46% from the field

I dont know.. 5 points more and 2 rebounds more a game is a big gap. Clearly you have no case to be the number 1 vote getter. With regards to the second vote getter, his team has a worse record than yours.. question is how much a difference that makes.

Clearly this isn't blatantly wrong.. maybe controversial... but if it were swapped than whoever was voted out would be up in arms.

This Post:
00
66644.31 in reply to 66644.30
Date: 1/4/2009 10:22:06 AM
MightyMice
IV.37
Overall Posts Rated:
494494
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
thank for your answer and for the time spent. It makes sense, although, as you stated, may be controversial. On the other side, Benedetto Ruella is 1st as 3 points shooting percentage, 12th in 3-pts shoots. Although just 12th, ASG should have "best" shooters.

Anyway, not a problem to me. ASG is not the main goal of the season, of course. In NBA too, if you are a great player but not the most popular you could not be selected to ASG. It is just an opportunity to understand logic and mechanism of the game.

thank you again

Advertisement