BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Question about fouls in game

Question about fouls in game

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
98874.21 in reply to 98874.20
Date: 6/29/2009 9:33:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
The thing i meant was that it is the foul that make sure you miss the shot.


I don't think the foul makes you miss the shot in BB - it is an interesting theory but... I was talking with Crazyeye in another thread and he was commenting on how teams that are strong defensively (as a team) will draw more fouls. That seems to imply that missing a shot makes fouling more common and not that high quality shooters draw more fouls.

Interesting and if true i think its wrong and should be fixed...

I´m not so good with all the defensive teams in the BB world so i thought i take a look at swedens number one (he cant be the worst defender anyway...)
He is averageing 14- 15 fouls the last seasons, to me that doesnt sound high...

I can also link one of his games (13113412)
The oponent are missing 56 shots and HHH fouls 9 times
HHH missing 57 shots and oponent fouls 27 times

This could be the exception that proves the rule (?) but to me it seems like better defence means less fouls...

Edit: I also think that 9 (off) vs 4 (def) would give a higher shooting % than 45 without the fouls, but all of this is just how I see it...


Last edited by Mannen at 6/29/2009 9:39:59 AM

/Mannen
This Post:
00
98874.22 in reply to 98874.21
Date: 6/29/2009 9:39:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155


This could be the exception that proves the rule (?) but to me it seems like better defence means less fouls...


I have always been of the opinion that better defense means less fouls, until Crazyeye told me otherwise. And yes, your example seems to be good evidence of that.

However, Crazyeye had some good examples, too. Maybe he will stop in here to post them. ;-)

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
98874.23 in reply to 98874.19
Date: 6/29/2009 9:43:06 AM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
32603260
I was convinced because it appears in some posts and BB unofficial spanish guides like:

(http://www.introbb.com/es/partidos/87-actitud-del-equipo....)

It says that doubtful occasions (shots, fouls, divided balls, etc.) will be favorable for your rival.

The match that i played with less attitude was(13102639)
I can´t say that something is white or black taking just one match, my opinion was that because i read it.

Right? Wrong? I´m not sure.

This Post:
00
98874.24 in reply to 98874.23
Date: 6/29/2009 9:57:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
It says that doubtful occasions (shots, fouls, divided balls, etc.) will be favorable for your rival.

There isn't anything to substantiate such a statement, not to mention that "doubtful occasions" is an unclear concept. Less effort will typically cause your team to perform worse in a game, but that's about all that's known for sure.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
98874.25 in reply to 98874.24
Date: 6/29/2009 10:06:18 AM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
32603260
I´m totally agree with you, but does it really mean that the number of fouls increase?
Same rival, same players, same tactics; if you play several matches against him, changing the attitude, is the number of fouls gonna change by the attitude?
I´m confused.

This Post:
00
98874.26 in reply to 98874.15
Date: 6/29/2009 10:21:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
Sorry, but no.

If you are fouled when attempting a three point shot and the shot misses, you receive three free throws.
If you hit the three point shot and are fouled, you receive three points and get to take one free throw.

It's like when you're fouled while scoring a two point shot - you still only get one shot, not two.

If you score a basket while being fouled you only get one additional shot.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
98874.27 in reply to 98874.21
Date: 6/29/2009 10:38:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
thenewchuckd says that i should link the examples, last time i just take all NT matches with a thirty point point differential, and in average the teams foul more who are winning and normally they also have the much stronger rooster.

I make this quite often in the past, and the result is most times the same so maybe you watch the games here:

/BBWeb/ntmatches.aspx

Till now there was only one game which fit the requirement, but really weird for the theory that good defenders make less fouls:

(6347) 46.147(+101) Fouls: 12 : 29

But normally it isn't that extreme.

Edit: The last game day in europe ->

(97744.9)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 6/29/2009 10:44:54 AM

Message deleted
This Post:
00
98874.29 in reply to 98874.27
Date: 6/29/2009 1:11:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
It is undoubtedly the case that the team that commits more fouls has a higher chance to lose the game. Whether or not playing TIE causes you to commit more fouls is a question that doesn't have definitive answer at this point.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
98874.30 in reply to 98874.29
Date: 6/29/2009 1:18:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
in this case china has the higher chanche to loose against vietnam?

We are currently talking about another partial aspect of the game, is good defence is avoiding fouls - and there fore i would say no till it gives you some extra fouls

This Post:
00
98874.31 in reply to 98874.29
Date: 6/29/2009 1:28:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
It is undoubtedly the case that the team that commits more fouls has a higher chance to lose the game.


Actually, what Crazyeye is showing is that the team that commits more fouls has a higher chance to WIN the game. ;-)

Most (all?) of his examples are taken from NT games, though. Maybe it is just that something weird is going on with the NT games?

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement