BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3

B3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
164600.212 in reply to 164600.205
Date: 12/10/2010 9:17:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
And, you know, I'm upset because I train balanced players for 5-6 seasons and because I avoid having players with high wages in my roster.
I'm training 2 SFs right now, it's very hard and slow. In my roster you won't find players earning more than 85k/week and I still manage to reach POs every season in Brazilian National League which is far from being weak. I've never made B3 but I've been cup runner up once losing in the finals to Vitoria Devils who later became B3's runner up. I'm so pissed off with daytraders winning B3 that if I reached B3 (which is still a [remote] possibility this season) I would go WO in protest.

This Post:
00
164600.213 in reply to 164600.211
Date: 12/10/2010 9:22:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
That's why I think rosters should be "frozen" in the beginning of B3. I mean: you could buy new players and fire them as well. But new acquisitions won't be eligible for playing on B3, only league, cup and scrimmages.

Last edited by LA-Bernspin at 12/10/2010 9:24:40 AM

This Post:
00
164600.214 in reply to 164600.213
Date: 12/10/2010 9:32:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Then would be the best to save more money before that and be in red numbers whole season. It seems like a making things more complicated with the same effect.

I personally think that the solution isnt in limiting amount of transfers. It is like a time traveling, if you have any restrictions for the future, is better to prepare yourself in past.

This Post:
11
164600.216 in reply to 164600.214
Date: 12/10/2010 9:42:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Then would be the best to save more money before that and be in red numbers whole season. It seems like a making things more complicated with the same effect.

I personally think that the solution isnt in limiting amount of transfers. It is like a time traveling, if you have any restrictions for the future, is better to prepare yourself in past.


Yes, let's make things complicated. We are talking about a competition for top teams, it should be the hardest as possible.
And yes, let's make teams have to be prepared even before gaining access to B3.
Teams should be faced with this kind of challenge: "well, it seems that I have real chances of winning this season's cup or league. If I succeed, I'll be on B3 next season, so I must be prepared, let's start planning right now".
And not with this kind of challenge: "I have a B3 game tomorrow, so I need to buy the best player available and spend almost nothing, so I'll look for some monster-wanderer-in-the-market and after the game I'll sell him without even have to play his wages".

This Post:
00
164600.217 in reply to 164600.216
Date: 12/10/2010 10:03:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Well back in the days it used to be possible to compete on all fronts without having to resort to all this transfer madness. But as ive said time and time before, if you thought you could win this season in the same way you are seriously kidding yourself.

This Post:
00
164600.218 in reply to 164600.217
Date: 12/10/2010 10:11:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Ok, dude, what you say makes sense, unfortunately. I'm just utopically trying to do something to avoid Buzzerbeater becoming Hattrick-Basketball version.

Well, if anything changes, this will be like Hattrick: lots of fun when you are on the lower leagues, training and improving your team makes sense and give you results, but when you promote to the top leagues you face the sad situation of having to daytrade and rely on rented "overtrained" "monsters" to succeed.

Well, back to november '08, season 2, when I discovered BB I thought "wow, this game is so cool, it looks like hattrick in many ways but is so much more complex and fun... and of course BB's developers will always have Hattrick to look at and avoid the same mistakes, I think I found the perfect online game manager". But now I realize I was wrong, BB developers have been making the same mistakes, and this is very sad.

This Post:
00
164600.219 in reply to 164600.216
Date: 12/10/2010 10:15:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
If your only problem is the fact that is has to be more about planning, then ok. Longterm-alltime transfer restriction is the way to go.

This Post:
00
164600.220 in reply to 164600.208
Date: 12/10/2010 10:18:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
Sure. Silves is the worse player I have seen in my life.

You went onto say how good he is.

Then this:
Of course he played for Tukums. That's why I wrote "he was a bless for Larrañaga".

Tell me straight out, is he good or bad?
You're sooo confusing.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
164600.221 in reply to 164600.210
Date: 12/10/2010 10:19:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
Oh my, I'm hurt.
Renting players is a good strategy.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
164600.222 in reply to 164600.220
Date: 12/10/2010 10:20:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
I'm just trying to be ironic, dude. But maybe I'm too unskilled in English to perform this kind of task.

Silves=good. His current market value=bad.



Last edited by LA-Bernspin at 12/10/2010 10:21:47 AM

Advertisement