BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread...3

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread...3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
251520.219 in reply to 251520.218
Date: 6/16/2015 2:00:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
You know he is right lol. His game came down to clock management also defense. I think he played very well, IMo

From: HAHA
This Post:
11
251520.220 in reply to 251520.219
Date: 6/17/2015 6:19:11 AM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
(85126375)

In this national tournament, I lost the game by 1 point, LOL ...

A lucky fan played for the opponent in the final 3~4 minutes of this game, it seems the lucky fan is a good player, how can I sign him for trial?

From: Lemonshine

To: HAHA
This Post:
11
251520.221 in reply to 251520.220
Date: 6/17/2015 6:41:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I think the crunch did it for him. And I think his ratings would have been different without 2 players fouling out (the 3rd fouled out at the very end).

Last edited by Lemonshine at 6/17/2015 6:41:49 AM

From: HAHA

This Post:
00
251520.222 in reply to 251520.221
Date: 6/17/2015 8:36:15 AM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
Thanks for your analysis ... :)

From: Lemonshine

To: HAHA
This Post:
00
251520.223 in reply to 251520.222
Date: 6/17/2015 11:08:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Quite shitty analysis really :P.

As a rule of thumb I think you need around 20 BB-stats difference (when there are no injuries) to be reasonably safe when playing TIE vs Crunch. BB-stats were 146-127 in your favour so you were there, but as mentioned that number is probably misleading due to foul outs and crunch time (it's not reflected in the ratings).

Buzzer-manager also shows "efficiency" and that was 113-111 to him. It's common for efficiency to be skewed compared to BB-stats if there is a big difference in effort or if there is garbage time/foul outs/injuries.

I think you were unlucky of course. Without the Crunch or without HCA I think you probably win that game even if his starters don't foul out. The problem is that the ratings are not really telling you anything clear in this case, because of the crunch and the foul outs.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 6/17/2015 11:12:34 AM

From: tough
This Post:
00
251520.224 in reply to 251520.223
Date: 6/20/2015 10:07:29 PM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
763763
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/85017803/boxscore.aspx)

Need thorough analysis on how the hell I lost this game

+3 enth, better gs, and gdp cash money right

So WTF?

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
251520.225 in reply to 251520.224
Date: 6/21/2015 12:58:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
Your GDP was great but they had HCA which made it a little closer, also are you sure they had -3 enth? I think the main things are them having HCA and them making 28-35 free throws. Generally when you send a team to the line over 30 times and the shoot 80% or better from the line, they are going to win.

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
251520.227 in reply to 251520.224
Date: 6/22/2015 10:57:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/85017803/boxscore.aspx)

Need thorough analysis on how the hell I lost this game

+3 enth, better gs, and gdp cash money right

So WTF?


Their starters were a lot better than yours, and you were kind of fortunate that the 110+ PP100 that his SG position scored saw his starter shoot 5-20. Beyond that and the fouls, there's the fact that even with the GDP their outside offense was roughly as much better than your perimeter defense as yours was to there's, and they owned the inside matchups, were slightly better on the boards and more than slightly better on the flow. But other than all that . . .

From: tough

This Post:
00
251520.228 in reply to 251520.227
Date: 6/22/2015 12:09:57 PM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
763763
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/85017803/boxscore.aspx)

Need thorough analysis on how the hell I lost this game

+3 enth, better gs, and gdp cash money right

So WTF?


Their starters were a lot better than yours, and you were kind of fortunate that the 110+ PP100 that his SG position scored saw his starter shoot 5-20. Beyond that and the fouls, there's the fact that even with the GDP their outside offense was roughly as much better than your perimeter defense as yours was to there's, and they owned the inside matchups, were slightly better on the boards and more than slightly better on the flow. But other than all that . . .



Wouldn't say a lot, they had measly 6k salaries. At most their skills were prolific. Guess I'm buying me 2 stud bigs when my salary floor spikes next season.

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
This Post:
00
251520.229 in reply to 251520.228
Date: 6/23/2015 3:18:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Buy smart, you don't need 'studs' at that level. Get someone who can do his job properly, focus on good secondary skills.

Maybe get an offensive guy and a defensive one. The defensive will have lower IS but solid ID/RB or ID/SB/RB combined with reasonable DR, possibly PA and secondaries. The offensive guy should be the usual dude with solid IS/ID but lower RB/SB and, again, possibly decent secondaries.

Then you need to set the attacker where your opponent defense is weaker (between PF and C) and assign the defender to take care of the opponent best big. So if the opponent's best player is at C, you set the attacker at PF and the defender at C. If the opponent best defender is at C and his best attacker is at PF, set your own attacker at PF then set your defender at C, but switch his defensive assignment to PF.

Hope it makes sense.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 6/23/2015 12:46:52 PM

Advertisement