I already realized that he did not provided a "proof", but bilker_76 or kozlodoev might have had some basis different than experience in order to put it in that way. I was looking for it.
I already realized that he did not provided a "proof", but bilker_76 or kozlodoev might have had some basis different than experience in order to put it in that way. I was looking for it.The only evidence I have seen as "proof" is minutes played. Someone once made a vague reference to me that their starters play more minutes in a slower pace than in a faster pace.However, I personally have attributed that to the fact that possessions tend to be longer in a slower pace. There are less stoppages in play and therefore less of a chance for the coach to make subs.Also, consider the fact that the BBs specifically mention in the rules that full court press has an effect on stamina. However, there is no mention of stamina under the discussion of pace.
Yes, but I have never read something about the role of pace in defensive tactics. However, it is also stated on the rules that defensive tactics do have pace.
Yes, but I have never read something about the role of pace in defensive tactics. However, it is also stated on the rules that defensive tactics do have pace.? That post seems a bit contradictory to me.I agree that just because it isn't said that it doesn't mean 100% that I'm right. However, I have seen no "good" evidence for the other side either. I'm just presenting my bad evidence for my side.
What about a BB saying that stamina do have an effect on performance?
What about a BB saying that stamina do have an effect on performance?I don't need a BB to say that to know it is true.It is not clear to me at the moment what I am discussing with you. Are we discussing that stamina has some importance (which I would agree with you)? Or are you saying that pace has an impact on stamina?If it is about pace, I am not understanding your points very well.
Related to the issue of tactics pace and stamina, my argument would be that if pace is not related to stamina, then, why defensive tactics do have pace? Because, it is pretty clear that argument of shot quality is not the point in defensive pace.
Related to the issue of tactics pace and stamina, my argument would be that if pace is not related to stamina, then, why defensive tactics do have pace? Because, it is pretty clear that argument of shot quality is not the point in defensive pace.It's not clear at all. There are two parties to a shot, an offensive and a defensive one. Both influence the quality of any given shot.
While I will agree that there are two parties to a shot let me ask you this: We know that pace is one of the variables wich decides wich is the shot quality our team will look for in the offense, now, how does that story fit with the role of pace on defensive tactics?
The relevance of defense to pace should be pretty straightforward: a defense that is listed as "slower pace" is likely one that will make you work longer in the clock to find a quality shot.