BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Advice on training player

Advice on training player

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
136735.22 in reply to 136735.21
Date: 4/7/2010 3:13:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
He is a longer term prospect, but has more upside. CP shows a rapid salary increase for him.

This Post:
00
136735.23 in reply to 136735.22
Date: 4/7/2010 3:30:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Longer term as what? Salary increases doesnt mean a better player just that they will cost more. The reason he shows such a fast salary increase is if he is trained as a guard the rebounding he already has will be expensive. Not that thats a bad thing just personal preference. I would never pick up a guard prospect w/ anything lower than mediocre OD and thats an extreme stretch he has to be a god other than that weakness.

This Post:
00
136735.25 in reply to 136735.1
Date: 4/8/2010 3:26:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
thats Rashad Lewis right there boii....train em he's worth iit...

This Post:
00
136735.26 in reply to 136735.23
Date: 4/8/2010 3:59:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thanks, still a complete noob here and am just trying to find a way to earn some cash to develop a better team. Long term I don't see either one of those players playing for my team, but maybe they can generate some income.

This Post:
00
136735.27 in reply to 136735.18
Date: 4/14/2010 4:15:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
After 9-10 Weeks of OD then what? He is then at the starting point of a decent trainee after wasting 70% of the season. If he is able to get any value from him its a much better call than pushing him to get to a starting point.


The flip side to this is if he has 2 other trainees that would also benefit and ramp up in value with 9 weeks of OD training. He is then faced with still a reasonable to good trainee albeit 19yo. But how many times would you draft better than this guy if he did have respectable OD at age 19??

This Post:
00
136735.28 in reply to 136735.27
Date: 4/14/2010 8:04:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I view any Draftees that are 19 as Free Money that I can get on the market. Losing that first year is so crucial to training and I wont bother training a 19y/o no matter how "nice" they are.

In this managers case even if he had 2 other trainees I felt the best move would be to cash out and utilize that cash elsewhere.

This Post:
00
136735.29 in reply to 136735.28
Date: 4/14/2010 8:07:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I view any Draftees that are 19 as Free Money that I can get on the market. Losing that first year is so crucial to training and I wont bother training a 19y/o no matter how "nice" they are.

In this managers case even if he had 2 other trainees I felt the best move would be to cash out and utilize that cash elsewhere.


Interesting point of view. I guess a lot depends on potential because unless we are talking an MVP you can get a perennial to max out by age 22 so if you imagine starting him at 19 and max him out at 23 thats no big deal is it? Do you think that if you trained the same regime for a player 18-22 vs 19-23 there would be more than 2 possibly 3 weeks of difference in what you could achieve?

This Post:
00
136735.30 in reply to 136735.29
Date: 4/14/2010 8:27:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I think there is a difference in this discussion between the different positions. With big men they train faster than guards as they have less positions to train and also cap faster(younger). In the case of bigmen I think your right that there would only be about a half a seasons difference (Roughly six week, 1 pop in each main skill).

However I train guards both of my 22 y/o's are MVP's and I believe only 1 of them will hit his cap. Age is going to be my biggest enemy as it takes guards far longer to reach their cap then big men. So in the case of guards I need that trainee to be 18 otherwise I'm shorting myself.

From: Rambo

This Post:
00
136735.31 in reply to 136735.30
Date: 4/14/2010 9:07:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Disagree FC. Gipson capped out at the end of his 22nd year. He is barely training anymore and he is Perennial Allstar. Superfly Guy is right. Also you need to think that there is a difference between established teams like ours and newer managers. They often don't have the money to spend on PRIME trainees so spending 1/4 of the price on 1/2 the player makes a tremendous amount of sense for them.

The best strategy for newer teams, in my opinion, is train for a year or two, sell, buy new trainees. It doesn't work well to train for 4-5 years before making a trade because they often have so many other holes.

This Post:
00
136735.32 in reply to 136735.30
Date: 4/14/2010 9:27:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I hear you - didnt think that it would be 6 weeks difference. I think my opinions are partially clouded by the fact ive been training older guys these past seasons and Im not entirely sure of the slowdown. I contribute some naturally to age and some to the soft cap of the potential.

I would reckon by the time your guards are almost done you will be at a competitive level where you might also have to train older guys mixed in with younger drafts as well.

Advertisement