BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - II.4 > New Scouting System

New Scouting System

Set priority
Show messages by
From: darykjozef

To: Edju
This Post:
00
149639.22 in reply to 149639.21
Date: 6/30/2010 3:24:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Yeah, I read that. It was the "in order" part I wanted you to clarify (I think Hambone VT is asking for the same clarity). What sort of order?


They'll be in order of quality from best to worst, but the rankings will be imperfect - not scouting at all and relying solely on the baseline rankings will leave you somewhat blind.


Ah. And I'm assuming that each team will have the same player(s) ranked a bit differently by the scouts, to prevent collusion?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Edju

This Post:
00
149639.23 in reply to 149639.22
Date: 6/30/2010 3:28:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Yeah, I read that. It was the "in order" part I wanted you to clarify (I think Hambone VT is asking for the same clarity). What sort of order?


They'll be in order of quality from best to worst, but the rankings will be imperfect - not scouting at all and relying solely on the baseline rankings will leave you somewhat blind.


Ah. And I'm assuming that each team will have the same player(s) ranked a bit differently by the scouts, to prevent collusion?


Each team will have its own baseline rankings, but the amount of uncertainty in each set of rankings will be the same.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: darykjozef

To: Edju
This Post:
00
149639.24 in reply to 149639.23
Date: 6/30/2010 3:43:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Yeah, I read that. It was the "in order" part I wanted you to clarify (I think Hambone VT is asking for the same clarity). What sort of order?


They'll be in order of quality from best to worst, but the rankings will be imperfect - not scouting at all and relying solely on the baseline rankings will leave you somewhat blind.


Ah. And I'm assuming that each team will have the same player(s) ranked a bit differently by the scouts, to prevent collusion?


Each team will have its own baseline rankings, but the amount of uncertainty in each set of rankings will be the same.


Um. Is that a yes?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Edju

This Post:
00
149639.25 in reply to 149639.24
Date: 6/30/2010 3:59:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Yeah, I read that. It was the "in order" part I wanted you to clarify (I think Hambone VT is asking for the same clarity). What sort of order?


They'll be in order of quality from best to worst, but the rankings will be imperfect - not scouting at all and relying solely on the baseline rankings will leave you somewhat blind.


Ah. And I'm assuming that each team will have the same player(s) ranked a bit differently by the scouts, to prevent collusion?


Each team will have its own baseline rankings, but the amount of uncertainty in each set of rankings will be the same.


Um. Is that a yes?


It's like those Japanese martial arts movies where they talk for like 20 seconds and the subtitle is one word.

In other words, that is a yes.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
149639.26 in reply to 149639.18
Date: 6/30/2010 8:16:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Am I that much of a dick?


Umm . . . yes? :-)


But an important question about the new scouting system. Doesn't this encourage collusion among teams? For example, I find 3 friends; each of us scout different players, and only one of us pays the 10 points to scout at the combine. Between the four of us we have scouted every player, and maybe even scouted multiple players twice. So we know info about every player. This seems problematic to me . . .

Last edited by squeakrico7 at 6/30/2010 8:16:52 PM

This Post:
00
149639.27 in reply to 149639.26
Date: 6/30/2010 8:42:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
On that note I have a great idea. Why don't all of us excluding Edju collude and make sure he gets jack for a draftee!

On the same note why don't we all agree to CT Edju and see if collectively we can manage to relegate him to DIII where he belongs.


This Post:
00
149639.28 in reply to 149639.27
Date: 6/30/2010 11:06:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Done.

And done.

This Post:
00
149639.29 in reply to 149639.26
Date: 6/30/2010 11:22:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I think there's still a mechanism in place to prevent that.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: FatCurry

To: Edju
This Post:
00
149639.30 in reply to 149639.29
Date: 7/1/2010 7:26:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
What's the mechanism? You go running to Charles: "My leagues picking on me... no one likes me down here...Waaaaaa"


From: Edju

This Post:
00
149639.31 in reply to 149639.30
Date: 7/1/2010 9:43:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
You guys are still soft compared to the NBBA in terms of ball busting.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: Toonces
This Post:
00
149639.32 in reply to 149639.1
Date: 7/1/2010 3:25:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4343
Guess I'll toss one out there.

The initial rankings are more than likely inaccurate. Should I assume that if a player has been scouted twice, that I'm looking at accurate information on a players skills, or can a twice scouted player still be inaccurately rated by my scouting staff?

Advertisement