BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > salary cap

salary cap

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
155287.22 in reply to 155287.20
Date: 9/8/2010 6:45:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


So, I think the cap for australian div 2 is around 500k (possibly a bit higher but not much higher).
And the cap for american div 2 is higher than that.

Yes,for sure,because of the Tv contract.
But please read the thread in BBGlobal about merchandise,and my answer to Crazy-Eye in this thread above this message
(155287.21)

(155836.20)


Last edited by Steve Karenn at 9/8/2010 6:47:46 AM

This Post:
00
155287.23 in reply to 155287.21
Date: 9/8/2010 7:35:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
It's easier to have NT players in malta than in Germany,and it's easier to have many players among the league leaders(both league and country)


league leaders are still just 10 per position right? And nationalplayer with few salary don't make the merch big, and you miss quality players of your nationality which reduce that a lot.(and for this influence is relative small)

In germany, italy and co. you normally get a player of your nationality who fit for needs, you have on this positio, and it is much easier to build a competive squad with mostly nationals.

And as is aid you play against opponents who have the same problem, and the same targets.

This Post:
00
155287.24 in reply to 155287.23
Date: 9/8/2010 8:11:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
You would not deserve an answer,as is clear that you don't read the posts that I answered with that phrase

I don't care about the merchandising of other country teams,but I have to answer to a false thing that Naker said.It's not authomatic that a stronger team has an higher merchandise,both in the same league or in different countries,and I explain why

Have you something to say to this clear fact?If you have not any argument about this,please shut up

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 9/8/2010 8:12:19 AM

This Post:
00
155287.25 in reply to 155287.24
Date: 9/8/2010 8:14:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i my eyes it isn't false was naker said, and you maybe could see the explanation for it in my post ;)

Thx for your nice words.

This Post:
00
155287.26 in reply to 155287.25
Date: 9/8/2010 8:31:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
It's not false at all,but surely it's not correct,as all the factors written in the rules can't be reduced as a question connceted only to the players strenght

From: Kukoc
This Post:
11
155287.27 in reply to 155287.26
Date: 9/10/2010 1:41:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
OMG it's Steve again :D