BuzzerBeater Forums

I think what the GM meant was that part of the challenge of this game is to figure out how things work for yourself and then use your understanding to do well in the game. That's a reasonable response, isn't it?

You're right, it is reasonable. What isn't reasonable is expecting us to figure out how UNREALISTIC things work, particularly when they are combined in the game engine.

For example, did my choice of defense spark my victory, or did my team's stamina spark a fourth quarter rally? Was that simply luck, or were my team's stamina-modified ratings now better than my opponent's poorly fit adjusted ratings?

What isn't reasonable is expecting us to figure out how UNREALISTIC things work,

Could not agree with you more and is the reason my own appreciation of BB is waning.

Perhaps in BB it is not, but it SHOULD be. Why should having supremely fit players be a liability? That is extremely unrealistic.

How many minutes did Kemba Walker play in the NCAA tournament? Or check out Bill Russell's career minutes per game numbers. Or Wilt's. Or Lebron. (http://www.basketball-reference.com/leaders/mp_per_g_care...) Those guys were/are supremely fit. It is not unrealistic for the coach to keep his best guys on the floor and try to win. In this game the coach is trying to win. He wants to keep his best players on the court to do so. If his best players are still more fit and better than their backups even after 40 minutes on the court, he's going to keep them in.

If that hinders the unrealistic minute management scheme in order to get players the minutes they need to keep their unrealistic game shape up or to get them the unrealistic minimum amount of minutes for the unrealistic once a week training that unrealistically only improves certain members of the team, then yeah I guess it is pretty unrealistic.

anything other than Man or the 2-3 and 3-2 zones are gimmick defenses IR

Just responding to what you said. I actually disagree with a lot of the coaching websites about box and 1. I think that in high school hoops it has a lot of value, and can in this game as well. I totally agree with you that it is a gimmick defense, but sometimes a gimmick works well. Ask KISS.

My main problem with FCP in this game is the penalty you take in rebounding. And that since I rarely train stamina anymore (In seasons 3 and 4 I did and had super high stamina and played FCP almost every game) it wouldn't work very well for my team in an important game.

I agree there are some unrealistic results from the game engine but I think you're referring to unrealistic things fed into the engine? Not sure what you're talking about there.

Figuring out what led to victory when multiple factors could be responsible is a matter of trial and error. Just play the same defence with players of worse/better stamina and see if you win, etc. Vary the degree of stimulus and see how much response varies. Works for figuring out most anything.