BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Layups: Driving or Inside Shot?

Layups: Driving or Inside Shot?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
185559.22 in reply to 185559.17
Date: 5/23/2011 5:00:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
I've read that although it says JS for wingmen trains IS, no has ever seen it happen.
I believe that it is useless to have DR higher than IS. I have a guard with atrocious DR and strong IS and he turns the ball over a lot less than another guard with proficient DR and inept IS.


i am training jump shot for wingmen this season, and i've done it before. All season long you should get about 2 pops in IS(3 if you're lucky).





This Post:
00
185559.23 in reply to 185559.20
Date: 5/23/2011 6:25:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Anyone else have a player with driving MUCH higher than driving? Would you be willing to analyze some play by plays and post here, similar to what I have done above?


Driving much better than driving? You mean driving better than IS, I guess... I have SG Paiva with DRI at 11 and IS at 1. I can't analyze play-by-plays because I'm not supporter. But check out this info...

30-4 look inside, Paiva's FG% 5-15 (24 mins)
3-5 look inside, 0-11 (37 mins)
5-5 push the ball, 0-1 (only 6 mins though)
7-5 look inside, 3-7 (14 mins)
10-5 push the ball, 2-17 (40 mins)
12-5 look inside, 4-5 (14 mins)
14-5 look inside, 2-6 (28 mins)
17-5 look inside, 2-5 (14 mins)
19-5 low post, 4-9 (26 mins)
21-5 run and gun, 10-18 (36 mins)

When he has to drive inside in inside oriented attacks, he sux. But when he needs to shoot from perimeter, he's ok.

From: Weather
This Post:
11
185559.24 in reply to 185559.23
Date: 5/23/2011 10:46:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
It's driving. You really only need 2-4 IS for guards. It's a flaw in the game logic.

The greatest of all time.
This Post:
00
185559.26 in reply to 185559.25
Date: 5/23/2011 3:52:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Hmmm sounds like a little bit more inside shot, higher than atrocious, would help...any idea how long it would take to single-position-train a 6'0" player in inside shot to get 1 pop? (let's assume level 5 trainer...).

This Post:
00
185559.27 in reply to 185559.26
Date: 5/23/2011 4:37:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
18 year old? play him out of position and you should get a pop every 2 weeks. 22-23 year old, maybe even 4-5 weeks(depends on other skills, cap level, potential, no one could actually give you an exact number).

From: Weather

This Post:
00
185559.28 in reply to 185559.25
Date: 5/23/2011 5:47:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
True, although I'd rather offset that with higher DRV.

DRV contributes to higher offensive flow, right?

The greatest of all time.
This Post:
00
185559.29 in reply to 185559.26
Date: 5/23/2011 7:23:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I think training Driviing on forward position will be enough to raise IS (especially if the figure there is more than 2).
I've got 2 18y.o. small player (less than 190 sm) with IS (7) and Driving (5) and (6) when they were born. Now, with relatively small amount of Driving training they have 8 in both skills. Other possible option - JS for wingers. It looks like it also trains IS, but in our case Driving training is more efficient.

This Post:
00
185559.30 in reply to 185559.27
Date: 5/23/2011 9:51:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Any idea which skills would correlate with inside shot in terms of elastic effect? Fill in the blank: High levels of ___________ will increase the speed of training inside shot.

This Post:
00
185559.31 in reply to 185559.30
Date: 5/24/2011 1:20:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
I have absolutely no idea. It would be hard to tell. However, I think the skill that would correlate the most is Inside Defense(this should be pretty certain), after which Driving and Jump Shot should also correlate nicely. But again, this is not a fact, just a guess.

The question is:
Is inside scoring a big men skill, or an all-around skill for everyone? because if it is a skill for everyone(which it should be) then the three skills above should be a major factor in elastic effect.

Advertisement