edit: Except there are no minutes assigned to the non-walkover team, heh. Representational bug?that is what I was pointing outBut it is not a representational bug because even in the players page they appear to have played 0.6 or 0.2 minutes...In the match viewer there are all statistics correctly though.
edit: Except there are no minutes assigned to the non-walkover team, heh. Representational bug?
yeah... i admit we didn't test the forfeit code that carefully... and somebody.. (cough * charles* cough) called the column name 'minutes' when he actually meant seconds... all the data is there.. we are fixing the minutes played right now for those games and i've already fixed it in the future.all fixed now i think
having only recently implemented the forfeit code which correctly highlights forfeits as forfeits in the boxscore data, we haven't yet updated the league leaders etc to only consider games which are not forfeits in the averages... i'm sure this will be done very shortly however.the previous situation was equally bogus, giving players credit for the whacky stats they earned against lucky fans.
Oh, and while we're at the new changes: is there any reason why the middle column of team ratings in the new box score is so narrow it has to go on two lines? There is so much space to use horizontally, and this makes the page unnecessarily long.This is a minor issue, but should be fairly straightforward to fix.I'll take responsibility for this one. I hacked together the new page pretty quickly, and didn't foresee this becoming a problem. It'll get fixed by Monday, hopefully.-Sascha
Oh, and while we're at the new changes: is there any reason why the middle column of team ratings in the new box score is so narrow it has to go on two lines? There is so much space to use horizontally, and this makes the page unnecessarily long.This is a minor issue, but should be fairly straightforward to fix.