BuzzerBeater Forums

1-2-1 does exist on the game is called 2-3 zone. The 5th man being the trap man, 3-2 zone is about the same. 3-2 zone is called 1-1-2. do you understand.

sb is a waste freaking time to honest, way to expensive little to no results. Managers don't do it .? why?? because it waste of freaking time, too expensive takes to long to get results. Get that point in your skull!!.. It doesn't not help, never has helped, this is the only season they tried to make it help and it still not helping unless you get a player 16+sb or play a weak team... show us who has that 16sb. Little to none has that. So before you open our mouth on sb learned I trained it since season 16. Its way to dam expensive and all 3-4 of my big men have 11, 13, 13, 14 in sb and we still get crushed by look inside.. You cant tell me nothing about sb. !! I train it with no immunity season before the game even said let increase shot block.. now they want to increase it .. ill say.. What the hell for? why not decrease Look inside so team can use other tactics and compete.? More better players on the market for all tactic not just 2.

Supporter for private is biggest perk on this game and look inside and that's about all. If they change LI or get rid of it. A up roar will happen . 8/10 team that play a week are using li or low post.

Why complicate things by saying 1-2-1, if you really mean 2-3? 2-3 is the common basketball term used by most in this game and in real life.

Did any of us create that flaw. A lot just used it to better their team.. ok sure. .

Whats best way to play this game. Li or low post.. IF that is the case then erase the other tactics.. what the hell you need them for.?? what good is a jump shooter when 60-80% of the market is made toward one tactic o r2 ways of play?

Your saying it not a problem. I'll say get for real hurley// seriously get for real.!! because it is huge problem and owners know it is. Instead scale it back, they upgraded sb.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 7/27/2013 11:31:08 PM

For what its worth I do have a player with 17 ID and 16 SB
Figured him as a non scoring - defending stopper
haven't made up my mind yet
The one game I needed him was the only one he fouled out of after 31 minutes

Have no fear my people, for I am not going to run a LI offense ever. I'll report my results as soon as everyone in my league isn't a robot. If I shoot up through the divisions don't expect me to say anything though. Then everyone will just do what I'm doing.

Mines always foul out too. As matter of fact every two out 3 games he is fouling out the last 2 season before it was not the case.

im not going to worry about it. instead of scale back li /lp back they claim sb is the answer. its takes a very long time to get that way to expensive. How long did take you to get 17sb gunner?

sb is a waste freaking time to honest, way to expensive little to no results. Managers don't do it .? why?? because it waste of freaking time, too expensive takes to long to get results. Get that point in your skull!!.. It doesn't not help, never has helped, this is the only season they tried to make it help and it still not helping unless you get a player 16+sb or play a weak team... show us who has that 16sb. Little to none has that. So before you open our mouth on sb learned I trained it since season 16. Its way to dam expensive and all 3-4 of my big men have 11, 13, 13, 14 in sb and we still get crushed by look inside..

You get crushed by LI because your big men aren't good. You've got a foul machine as your primary C and I don't have much confidence in your guys' ability to outperform their salaries if you pay as little attention to secondaries as you did on Berry, who can't have any passing to speak of. Which is a shame, since I thought you had learned so much about tactics while stomping on bots in V.

Whats best way to play this game. Li or low post.. IF that is the case then erase the other tactics.. what the hell you need them for.?? what good is a jump shooter when 60-80% of the market is made toward one tactic o r2 ways of play?

I just played three games in three days against teams with very good LI attacks - two that put up prolific Inside Scoring ratings and a third that was just proficient but with extremely good flow and who has been shooting well over 50% this season. I played Princeton (mostly an outside offense) all three times. I won all three games comfortably. Now there is of course the matter of home court and all three teams are quite solid, but don't cry to me about not being able to stop LI to the point of needing to have it pulled from the game. The fact that you can't figure out an effective defense doesn't mean that the tactic is irrevocably broken. It just might be that the way you're trying to stop it is wrong.

90% of this game is getting crushed by li> your being naïve .. this conversation pretty much ran it course because your in denial no point in having this conversation..

save me and everyone your sob story man, your in denial . instead of tone down li they say increase the most unused tactic on this game.. Be for real man.. Like I said before this conversation has ran it course. pretty much ,.