BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > NT coach dismiss

NT coach dismiss

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Bevzil
This Post:
00
12157.23 in reply to 12157.11
Date: 1/21/2008 6:42:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
Our NT-Coach, Eldin, just became officially inactive and his team turned to bot... Are we gonna get new elections NOW??? We've been waiting for a long time already...

From: LA-Niko

This Post:
00
12157.24 in reply to 12157.23
Date: 1/21/2008 6:19:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
I think this is happening at the beginning of the new season.

Still waiting on news about this from the BBs

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
From: Bevzil

This Post:
00
12157.25 in reply to 12157.24
Date: 1/21/2008 7:02:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
Thanks...

I really hope we'll get the new elections soon...

From: KifaH

This Post:
00
12157.26 in reply to 12157.25
Date: 1/21/2008 7:04:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
If elections will be held at the begining of the new season, it is till better than wait another season:)

From: Bevzil

This Post:
00
12157.27 in reply to 12157.26
Date: 1/21/2008 7:13:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
It wouldn't be fair from BBs to let us wait the whole season... The difference between other NTs and ours would be really big... We played only one NT scrimmage...

If they give us elections at the start of the season, great... That's two weeks away...

From: Asasasa

This Post:
00
12157.28 in reply to 12157.27
Date: 1/21/2008 7:41:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
The Czech Republic ended up quite badly too. Their GM hadnt scheduled a scrimmage during his tenure and he was botified today. They are last in NT rankings because of that.

Message deleted
From: jimrtex

This Post:
00
12157.30 in reply to 12157.24
Date: 1/21/2008 10:53:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I still think it would be best to hold new elections for all the countries that missed out advancing (50 of 74 have been eliminated), with an election for a potentially 3 season term. They should now be looking towards the next qualification that starts in Season 5. But now they are lame ducks, with any talent that they develop being used by the next coach.

If the coach has been doing a good job, but the team missed advancing; there is a reasonable chance that he can be re-elected if he wants to keep going. And if he is so-so about wanting to continue, he has a graceful way to exit. And if the coach is now gone, or isn't really trying, a new coach will be elected without the BB having to intervene.

From: Pallu

This Post:
00
12157.31 in reply to 12157.18
Date: 1/21/2008 10:58:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
No, the 2nd is not a good idea... I'll tell you why... For Bosnia & Herzegovina, this is the first BB season... And as soon as we came here, there were NT elections... We were thrown into it, literally... Of course, we chose the one 'sweet talk' candidate, since no one had any experience... But now the things are different... We do know something about the game, we have a season behind us... Our NT-coach is inactive for a month, we are waiting for his team to become a bot... We should have a new elections, cause now we know who the 'serious' players are... And by the way, the 2nd one is inactive as well...


1.) I am very much in favour of a fast replacement of bitified/banned NT-Coaches. I do not see any sense of demotivating a young local community by having the NT run by ghosts.

2.) In my humble opinion it must absolutely be the runner-up who becomes next coach, and that is exactly because of your arguments and not in spite of them. Reason: the learning curve you described is also valid for nations with an active coach... ! And they must live with the elected coach, even if today they might take a different decision. So eliminate the disadvantage: yes. Give a clear advantage: no.

From: Bevzil

This Post:
00
12157.32 in reply to 12157.31
Date: 1/22/2008 12:31:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
No, the runner-up in BiH logs every 3 or 4 weeks, so he's not a good solution... Winner and 3rd from the elections are inactive now, and all the others had just 1 or 2 votes... We need new elections...

And I don't see why we shouldn't have them... We are already in big disadvantage by not having played NT scrimmages, missed a lot of NT points... And we should get something for that... And I can't see what kind of clear advantage we would have if you know that the whole season ahead of us is full of scrimmages only... It's not like we're going to compete for the World Cup :)

Edit: Following your logic, the countries that have been in BB from the beginning are in HUUUUUUGE advantage... We should do something about it :)

Edited by Bevzil (1/22/2008 12:36:27 AM CET)

Last edited by Bevzil at 1/22/2008 12:36:27 AM

This Post:
00
12157.33 in reply to 12157.32
Date: 1/22/2008 9:00:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
after reading numerous posts about it, and contributing to them myself, I now come up with a sugestion that might be worth considering:

Keep the system of election every 2 season, but ADD the option of an extra election at the start of the seasons in between.
When will there be an election?
- if the current NT coach is set to inactive (NT team is bot team)
- if the current NT coach decides he wants to quit.

So if the NT coach decides he wants to fullfill his job for which he was elected, no extra election occurs for that country.

Possibly this might be expanded to having an extra election also in the case:
- the NT coach's popularity drops below 30%


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
Advertisement