BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > OD vs Passing/JS/JR

OD vs Passing/JS/JR

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
178233.23 in reply to 178233.22
Date: 3/25/2011 12:33:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
295295
Very nice analysis!

Outside shooters miss WAAAy to much in this game, beyond just how low JR is usually trained, I just think OD has too big an impact on outside shots.

I'm not sure about this, maybe it's caused by a faster pace in this game than in reality, so that it's less boring to watch the games and it still produces kind of realistic outcomes and statistics... but i haven't counted average posessions per game, it's just a feeling :-)

From: Hadron
This Post:
11
178233.24 in reply to 178233.23
Date: 3/25/2011 1:47:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
I also think OD is too important in this game. It annoys me no end to see my guards shooting 35%. Takes a lot out of the game for me.

Fact is, if they can have shot blocking as a separate skill for big men then they should also have stealing separately for perimeter defenders. There are lots of players who have above average steal numbers but are not necessarily the best defenders. This would even things out a little on the defensive end.

But I think the most important reason things are unbalanced on the defensive end is that players have no trainable physical skills. Physical ability is crucial in defending - strength, jumping, quickness matter a lot when it comes to defence. But making such changes would probably require an overhaul of training, so I don't know if any of this is viable. Would love it if it happened though..

From: 7ton

This Post:
00
178233.26 in reply to 178233.19
Date: 3/25/2011 11:00:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545

Forrester describes OD's importance in the GE:
I think the new GE made changes that most teams haven't made the appropriate adjustements to. I think the problem really is with handling and passing than with OD. Those ratings used to not have a very large effect, and now we have increased the importance of how the handling/passing of a team balances against the defensive pressure being applied. Teams that put out a very stiff outside defense will pressure the guards, and if the guards don't have the ball handling and passing skills to navigate around this pressure more turnovers will result.

In addition, if OD is too low, its going to give guards and easier time finding passing lanes, resulting in more assists etc. And we turned up the size of this tradeoff. So I think teams have focused more on OD, and have defensive options which modify this rating, but really its changes in both handling/passing and outside defense which have altered team dynamics.

I don't know if everyone feels that its too dominant an effect, but our feeling is that handling/passing rates will rise over time and some of what you are talking about will go down over time.

I find it funny how PA still is the least trained skill, ofc second after SB.

OD used to be that important 2-3 seasons ago but not anymore. OD now can't stop inside offense with low offensive flow. Back then playing inside players in SF is a big no-no. There used to be weekly threads complaining inside tactics with shit offensive flow doesn't make inside shots. It's so obvious BB has tuned down the effect of OD and we are back to inside offense dominating the game.

Last edited by 7ton at 3/25/2011 11:06:08 PM

From: 7ton

This Post:
00
178233.28 in reply to 178233.27
Date: 3/26/2011 5:36:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
The match attitude has unbalanced the game too much. I don't think you can draw useful conclusions from that game.

This Post:
00
178233.31 in reply to 178233.29
Date: 3/27/2011 2:28:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Hm, I woldn't put that exactly like you did...

Let's say I face a guy with OD 15 and I have a PG like this:

JS: 12 JR: 10
OD: 14 HA: 16
DR: 16 PA: 15
IS: 8

Other skills are not necessary for this topic.

If I play Look inside with this guard, I think opponent's player's OD won't stop him much. But if I play Motion with the same guy, he will get destroyed by OD 15.

That's what I meant.

From: HAHA

This Post:
00
178233.32 in reply to 178233.10
Date: 12/17/2016 9:47:46 PM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
I have a French PG, whose OD 18 defended the opponents' PG pretty well.

(92167583), opponent's PG 1/14