Yes it is ok to compare them because they both are still playing...lebron was putting up better stats in his second year than bryant LOL.Also don't you dare to bring up rings or any stuff like that because lakers have freaking 90m roster and ofcourse they just got swept LOL.
http://hoopsapedia.webs.com/kobebryantvslebron.htm
Read this...
Talk about a response fraught with contradictions!
Firstly, Kobe and LeBron are in very different stages of their careers. If you want to compare them, fine - but at least do so with balance. Because at the end of the day - all that matters is the rings. Everything else is window-dressing.
Secondly, let's have a look at your somewhat contradictory post.
*
Don't bring up rings, but bring up stats... so the most important statistic of them all - winning - is irrelevant?
*
Situations only matter when you say they do? You deride Kobe for playing with a good roster, but praise LeBron for statistical accumulation. You do realise why LeBron accumulated those stats, right? And why LA got rings? Better roster. You can't discount one and keep the other.
*
Individual vs team... Again, you choose to highlight LeBron's individual awards, but downplay Kobe's team-based ones. Completely unfair.
*
Lies, damn lies... and statistics. You can compile all the stats you like, but LeBron had 2 teams that won over 60 regulation season games in a season... and fell flat in the playoffs.
Kobe has how many rings now? And when the sun sets, that's all that matters. LeBron will no doubt get a championship, maybe even multiple ones. But it's taken a run to Dwyane Wade's team with Chris Bosh to get 'em. And that, will pretty much damn him in the GOAT conversation forever more.
Last edited by malice at 6/5/2011 5:36:19 AM
http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan