BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 3C Look Inside

3C Look Inside

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
196426.23 in reply to 196426.19
Date: 9/14/2011 2:52:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Edit: so have fun here -> (181900.1). And here we could discuss if there is a trend to play with 3 C, and/or if it is to powerful. I would disagree in both, and would also say the current trend is playing with none C and replacing them with PF.
I have already posted in this thread and so has Charles. He has explained the situation quite clearly imo.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
196426.24 in reply to 196426.23
Date: 9/14/2011 3:08:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Edit: so have fun here -> (181900.1). And here we could discuss if there is a trend to play with 3 C, and/or if it is to powerful. I would disagree in both, and would also say the current trend is playing with none C and replacing them with PF.
I have already posted in this thread and so has Charles. He has explained the situation quite clearly imo.


i just wanted to lead you to a place to discuss it ;)

Today my first PL opponent played witha Center on SF, it wasn't really a fair matchup but i think his +/- and points per 100 shots says a lot about it and i even don't line up a shooter against him.

(38851671)

From: po

This Post:
00
196426.27 in reply to 196426.24
Date: 9/15/2011 6:06:19 AM
Your defense are really good,so he cant made basket .
Actually,i saw you play BO to win B3 games, that's a good one
and I think using different tatics make this game much more fun:)

From: CrazyEye

To: po
This Post:
00
196426.28 in reply to 196426.27
Date: 9/15/2011 7:22:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i won't say that he would won the game with another SF, but he had below 50 point per 100 shots which make me skepticcal about the offensiv output of such solutions(his C/PF roughly made the double amount) and he played 31 minutes and lost 40 points in the 17 minutes without him he lost just 5 points.
Yes all his starters was worse, but the minutes where they play without him or he played alone with the backups was better for his game on a +/- basis.

And cause i let the coach do my lineup, he should have faced many different lineups from me and his backup don't come into play when my backups comes(the coach start substitute pretty early, and don't cares about blowout).

PS: i believe i played BO just in the PL, but the test wasn't bad.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 9/15/2011 7:29:38 AM

From: po

This Post:
00
196426.29 in reply to 196426.17
Date: 9/15/2011 7:45:39 AM
From:: moutlinho
Date: 2011/9/15 上午 05:07:56

as far as i can see, three big men tactic is quite popular at NT level..
it's easy to crush wth Patient at lower levels but no idea how it will work with NT guys..

Hope you wont really want me to count the number XD
Actually,It's not difficult to find teams using 3C LI or just LI

I DO know the situation and the prices of Center and the training of SF.
I admire your reply :) but it seems that you only explain the situation to me >_<
Maybe I am too harsh but I do hope this game become better.
Also,I know it is just a FREE game so I should not be that harsh.
I have played BB since S7 but I find this game become less fun in the recent seasons

Plus, cross-training is just another stupid and non-sense thng but I wont discuss it in here
(No Off topic XD)


LI is not stronger, it's just more suitable for more players, that BB managers produce.

Yes,we can beat LI but why everyone use it?
I believe one of the reason maybe it was mentioned in the NEWS that
LI will be more powerful than before( I do forgot the exact season,sorry )

Like always in basketball, short range jumper, is an easier shot, than a long range jumper.

Yep,you are true:)
but I think the fact that many team play LI is true too
>_<maybe I am too stubborn about it.
As I face many teams, they always use LI
I do think it's less fun on playing BB >_<

anyway,i do really thanks for your previous reply

From: CrazyEye

To: po
This Post:
00
196426.30 in reply to 196426.29
Date: 9/15/2011 8:06:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Hope you wont really want me to count the number XD


i like to ;) Cause i don't see the trend.

My B3 rounds: 2 times SG, 4* SF, 1* C(who performs real bad) as SF starter

In my roster the order is SG, SF and then PF while you could discuss if the PF is not the best but he is even better as a PF and needed there most.

U21 WC last 6 games, i count all who played most times at SF(above 5min):
PG: 4
SG: 12
SF: 2
PF: 2
C: 4

NT last three games(4 teams):
PG III
SG I
SF IIIII
PF III

this also result into the training time, which make it hard for them to be effective at U21 level. and the bad recognisation in SF of the system. My SG is for me clearly an SF, he lacks a bit in IS but this isn't even part of his salary afaik.

From: Kukoc

To: po
This Post:
00
196426.32 in reply to 196426.29
Date: 9/15/2011 9:34:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Plus, cross-training is just another stupid and non-sense thng but I wont discuss it in here
(No Off topic XD)
To me and prolly many managers, this is one of the best changes to the game by far. Sure it's a bit of a slap in SF trainers faces, but it's a great tool to discourage those monoskill monster trainers (lvl7 trainer, single position). Sure they get those few skills to wanted levels, but they lose more training (because of inequality in skills) while doing so.

Last edited by Kukoc at 9/15/2011 9:34:39 AM

From: WillFreeman

To: po
This Post:
11
196426.33 in reply to 196426.29
Date: 9/15/2011 9:41:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038

Hope you wont really want me to count the number XD
Actually,It's not difficult to find teams using 3C LI or just LI


Hi Marty, your De Lorean is waiting outside. Come back to us. To the Future. We are now in season 17, not like u in season 8. U pushed the wrong bottoms!!

:-DDD

Advertisement