BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Forum Day Topic: Training Options

Forum Day Topic: Training Options

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
29688.23 in reply to 29688.21
Date: 5/9/2008 1:57:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Both of these examples aren't too good, since they're not universal. A PG routinely uses his IS in a Look Inside/Low Post formation, and a C shoots plenty of three pointers in a Princeton tactic.

The thing is, the system is self-correcting there: the better the three-point shooting on a C becomes, the more he will start shooting them, on average, since his three-pointer will become a relatively better shot.

So one shouldn't get too carried away with this framework.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
29688.24 in reply to 29688.23
Date: 5/9/2008 2:11:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Both of these examples aren't too good, since they're not universal. A PG routinely uses his IS in a Look Inside/Low Post formation, and a C shoots plenty of three pointers in a Princeton tactic.

It is not even universally true that a 221cm guy trains faster than a 211cm, but I think we can accept the simplification.

Anyway, my main point is that the training system is the LAST feature of BB that I would like to see modified.
Let's not make the training too easy :)

Last edited by Newton07 at 5/9/2008 2:12:00 PM

This Post:
00
29688.25 in reply to 29688.24
Date: 5/9/2008 2:12:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I enjoyed the edit.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
29688.26 in reply to 29688.25
Date: 5/9/2008 2:13:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
:P

This Post:
00
29688.27 in reply to 29688.24
Date: 5/9/2008 2:16:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I agree that radical modifications aren't needed. I think slight modifications might improve training. I've mentioned these in my other post: more regimes being able to select 'Swingmen' and 'Forwards' as an option.

Other than that, I think we're pretty much on the same page.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
29688.28 in reply to 29688.22
Date: 5/9/2008 2:25:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I have to agree with WFU on this one, and have thought this since back to the beta days.

It's seems more unrealistic to have a PG play at C to get training then to be able to just train that skill at the preferred position.

Plus, more flexibility in training should only improve the ability to create balanced players, which is key to BB.



Now some of us have 4 game weeks (or even when we return to 3 game weeks) we have to wait til scimmages to play guys completely out of position to get training.

If we (as we do) understand the height penalties for training Inside skills to short guards and vice versa why can we not be given the option?

This week I would choose to train passing but not for PG/SG as i will max out my mins on guards and so I would choose PG/C (suitable for my outside game) or SG/C. If the Centres took longer so be it.

Anyway the point is pretty clear and in the open... either you guys plan to or dont mind opening it up to give more flexibility to managers that want it OR for the sake of simplicity keep it the same (or for another reason you may not be wishing to disclose!)

This Post:
00
29688.29 in reply to 29688.21
Date: 5/9/2008 3:51:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
170170
It really takes good managing to train effectively and it is probably the only way for a weaker team to fill the gap with reacher and stronger ones.
True, true.

This Post:
00
29688.30 in reply to 29688.10
Date: 5/9/2008 4:03:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00


It isn't much different than telling LeBron that he can't start half of the time because you want someone else to also train ("I know you are by far our best player, but you've already played 48 minutes this week - go sit down").


Except a team might sit their best player in an unofficial game, which is what I'm guessing most of us do. Other than that I have to agree this is a good idea. Who says a team WOULDN'T want to focus on wingmen rebounding or big man passing? That's pretty much what makes European players so sought after IRL now, and forget LeBron, you could NEVER make a Dirk Nowitzki in BB.

This Post:
00
29688.32 in reply to 29688.31
Date: 5/9/2008 4:24:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Great day for poker too.


Bring it. (Seriously, how many people around here play?)

Well, I've been meaning to give it a try, I guess Though I am not much into the gambling side of it, I guess.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
29688.33 in reply to 29688.31
Date: 5/9/2008 4:24:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
170170
I'm every day all-inn.

Advertisement