BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Potential cap

Potential cap

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
98371.23 in reply to 98371.22
Date: 7/6/2009 12:29:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
maybe confusing


There is no maybe, it is indeed confusing. Why not use the text instead of numbers? I must admit that I barely looked at the table because I had no idea what a 7 potential is.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
98371.24 in reply to 98371.23
Date: 7/6/2009 12:31:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
the numbers makes it compatible, for the languages - mayn people who post in forum don't use the english language in game and that why they didn't know the potential names.

This Post:
00
98371.25 in reply to 98371.23
Date: 7/6/2009 12:32:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
592592
i just cleaned up the spanish names and put some numbers to try to help.


For sure next time or i'll post it in Spanish or do not post


regards to everyone

Howl to the Moon, you won't regret it.
This Post:
00
98371.26 in reply to 98371.25
Date: 7/6/2009 12:41:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
i just cleaned up the spanish names and put some numbers to try to help.

For sure next time or i'll post it in Spanish or do not post



Sorry - I didn't even think about the language issue so please forgive my ignorance. I retract my previous message.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
98371.27 in reply to 98371.26
Date: 7/7/2009 2:52:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
Can someone confirm that older players with potential " allstar* " can NOT be trained further than the new ones with potential "allstar"?

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
98371.28 in reply to 98371.27
Date: 7/7/2009 10:09:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Confirmed. *allstar* and allstar are the same potentials. Players generated before the implementation of the potential system were all given a potential of *allstar*.

This Post:
00
98371.29 in reply to 98371.28
Date: 7/7/2009 2:18:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
according to bb-stats they are a bit different i suppose. allstar* is a better trainee at same age, at least it says so but i am not sure if it is a reliable info.

Last edited by left hand path at 7/7/2009 2:18:21 PM

This Post:
00
98371.30 in reply to 98371.29
Date: 7/7/2009 2:27:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
If it's allstar, it's allstar whether or not it has an asterisk.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
98371.31 in reply to 98371.29
Date: 7/7/2009 3:23:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Trust us...they're the same.

This Post:
00
98371.32 in reply to 98371.29
Date: 7/8/2009 4:32:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
They are definitely the same. Since an allstar* potential player may have received training before the potential system was implemented, the effect of potential may not have affected their past training (very very long ago). Allstar potential is allstar potential with or without the asterisk, no difference.

This Post:
00
98371.33 in reply to 98371.32
Date: 7/9/2009 6:52:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I am just asking myself if any potential above allstar is really "necessary" - I dont see the advantage you have with higher potentials unless you want to train a 200k+ player who rarely can be afforded by teams. I seem to have overrated potential in the past.

imo sticking with players who can reach 50k+ salaries is enough in the BB universe, isnt it?

Advertisement