BuzzerBeater Forums

I've had my team for 2 full seasons now. At maximum prices, I barely started tipping full attendance of my original arena midway to the season. I have been expanding ever since, and I am maintaining full attendance at maximum prices right now at 5700 seats or thereabout.

I've had my team for 2 full seasons now. At maximum prices, I barely started tipping full attendance of my original arena midway to the season. I have been expanding ever since, and I am maintaining full attendance at maximum prices right now at 5700 seats or thereabout.

Apples to oranges, you've in lower divisions, and we're comparing teams in top divisions of new countries correct? STH growth at lower divisions isn't comparable to STH in top divisions, unless I'm vastly overestimating the growth of STH's for teams that start in new countries at the top level.

I just don't understand some of the dire end-of-the-world comments coming out here, and so far, there's little evidence that it's nothing more then hyperbole.

This is a big change, and fairly or not, some manager will be hit harder then others. I don't expect the BB's to refund portions transfer fees to managers that recently paid large sums for players at market rate, while the market rate is now set to take a steep decline due to these changes. Also, without good evidence of completely unlevel playing fields or economic environments that are impossible, I don't expect the BB's to make different rules for different countries.

The designed measure tax income a nominal 40%, and plan to compensate by allowing for increased attendance.

As part of this system, there will be a new system governing attendance which will hopefully be more predictable, easier to understand, and with less variance from game to game. This system will take effect at the start of next season, and the overall global attendance will be the same as it is right now.

While the new attendance formula will leave the global average attendance in the same spot, the opponent's fan base will have a larger impact, which will result in higher-division teams seeing slightly higher attendance.

You'd excuse me if I feel strongly about someone trying to do brain surgery with a pickaxe.

Further, we're not taking away 40% of all income. While the new attendance formula will leave the global average attendance in the same spot, the opponent's fan base will have a larger impact, which will result in higher-division teams seeing slightly higher attendance.

You'd excuse me if I feel strongly about someone trying to do brain surgery with a pickaxe.

This analogy applies across the board though, we're all taking a big hit, and it's much more complex then this isolated issue.

There is also the point that established teams are the driver in top players with top salaries, steadily training become more and more expensive as salaries start to grow at a higher rate. How will top teams survive, they are doomed with the pending expenses while have revenue greatly reduced!

There's the potential skill cap, established teams are or will be having players start to hit there caps, how can top teams survive this, they are doomed!

I overstated the emphasis on these last two examples cause, at this point, it's only realistic concern. But, as a realistic concern it also adds to the issues established teams have to deal with that newer teams don't.