BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 2-3

2-3

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Bigcatjc

This Post:
11
186170.25 in reply to 186170.24
Date: 6/12/2011 12:25:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
It's just an example of extremely poor deductive reason and logic.

It's not susceptible to layups. Why would you play 2-3? To counter LI.

LI = Driving layups.


Most people won't even play 2-3 against an even neutral offense, and against an outside offense it's considered suicide.

I highly doubt the Motion offense would replicate the success of driving layups as the LI offense does against the 2-3.

That said, it'd destroy you from outside.

This Post:
00
186170.27 in reply to 186170.24
Date: 6/12/2011 2:26:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Yes, that is true. After listening to all those people complain about 2-3 allowing driving guards and open 3s, I analyzed many games and comparing 2-3 to man to man, the number of drives by the guards were quite close, therefore shows that almost everyone who claims 2-3 is crap is talking crap. However, it does leave your team vulnerable to a lot of 3s...



Well, a lot of threes is what you give up when playing 2-3 zone. But I would prefer that as opposed to giving a lot of inside shots

This Post:
00
186170.29 in reply to 186170.28
Date: 6/12/2011 5:43:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
precisely:)

This Post:
11
186170.30 in reply to 186170.21
Date: 6/12/2011 7:26:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
gotta say i love your tag lines dissing lebron lol i use the one about west and his mum as my own ;)


"the labor party cant even spell surplus, let alone deliver one"
This Post:
00
186170.31 in reply to 186170.30
Date: 6/12/2011 10:52:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
104104
I agree they crack me up heres an example: Lebrons heading East, but his mom is still ridin West.

Advertisement