Overall, the US team was undermanned (talent-wise) IMO, against teams like Brazil, Spain and of course Italy
Overall, the US team was undermanned (talent-wise) IMO, against teams like Brazil, Spain and of course Italy, who also had the benefit of home court. Since the US had to maintain higher enthusiasm to overcome these teams should they meet, do you believe it better to CT to get a win, even if that means you're risking any chance of the ultimate goal, winning the tournament? This was the case against Nigeria were it wasn't even assumed they would CT and even if they did, we'd still have a chance (only 8 point loss). If you knew that a normal would give you a "toss-up" chance of advancing, would you take that to keep the ultimate goal intact?
you'd stand no chance of beating italy in a "win or go home" game, you know that… yet you're going to win, since italy will field third- and fourth-tier players who didn't make it to the world cup 18 (which actually were 20). don't mix usa vs italy with the other games, the other wins are worth much more.