BuzzerBeater Forums

I think that would not be great problems for BBB,because the difference among the first divisions all over the world is quickly closing up,and so the difference in a possible new system,as everyone can see from the TV contract all over the world,so it's not a real argument;among the top users the only that could be really penalized is Superfly(I would be sorry,I have nothing against him,it would be his country to being too weak)


The mistake that BBs make last time that they pump up money in the system,was exactly to not calculate that giving money to everyone independently from their economic situation,would only boost the prices without really change the equilibrium on the market to penalize less than in the previous situation the users of big countries,especially in lower divisions,that was the original goal of BBs(I think)

The incomes have not to be raised for everyone at the same level,it should work on the max arena attendance,if italian league is more competitive than the X league,if the X league has a max attendenc of 10000 people in the III division,the italian III division should have a 12000 max attendence(these are not precise numbers,its only an example),so the best team in the III division would have the incomes for 12000 peolpe,the worst the incomes of 10000 people and so on...

In the actual system,there's yet a practically hard cap,because there's a max in incomes that you can reach if all the variables are at the max(fans survey,adequate prices at the palace and so on)
That max should be raised in the different way in the various leagues,looking at the competitivity of the league...the only thing to be chosen is the way to calculate the competitivity of the leagues,which is a difficutl thing to do
Country rank surely isn't a good way to calculate the competitivity of a league,the random cup draw or the different choices about cup in the various league would influence too much the incomes of the various leaguje
Overall team skills could be put in the mix,but not as the only factor,because you can do very different value on some skills,especially on secondary skills,which often make the difference between similar players and teams;the same speech is for salaries and evaluations....but I think there should be the BBs to find the formula,we as users have to give the ideas,they have the duty to develop them ;D

(150570.2) Actually the strongest leagues TV contract has improved more than the lower leagues. For example German teams make more 70k+ more money from tv contract per week than Japanese teams + because of better quality in the league, their merc income could (lol insert NT self drafted player here) be higher aswell + as a big country there are more german players on the TL etc,etc...

Germany is an exception also among the big countries,if you see well,Bulgaria Cyprus and Iceland grow more than Italian Serie A,Holland and Estonia grow at the same pace
But the point is that while the big country are near to the max,the other users have room to grow,If our TV contract rise up,is because the overall Tv contract all over the world rise up,not because Italian I division grow

P.S. I think it's stupid that ther's only a TV contract for all the season,many teams make movements after the draft,so there should be an update of the TV contract at least at the ASG break

But the point is that while the big country are near to the max,the other users have room to grow,If our TV contract rise up,is because the overall Tv contract all over the world rise up,not because Italian I division grow

you should know what are you talking about, before making your opinion a fact. TV contract is linked to the quality of the league and not whole world. you can read this here: (93604.14)

Last edited by Rycka at 7/29/2010 7:33:25 AM

No, Team Chemistry will get in the game just like potential did. It will count from now on.

If an Iceland divI league is catching up to Italy, then that means theyr quality is improving. If a country with 50 users has the same contract in divI as a country with 5000 users, then theyr I divisions are equal in strenght.
If you can not boost your income any more in the divI then you are at the salary cap. If every team is at their cap (and that would be all drafted players evenly trained being NT members and evenly spread out league leaders) then you can take it as BB's salary cap. You can not raise one countrys income just because there are 5000 users in that country.
Looking at Germany, Italy is not even near it's cap now. So why does Italy need a raise in income?

But the point is that while the big country are near to the max,the other users have room to grow,If our TV contract rise up,is because the overall Tv contract all over the world rise up,not because Italian I division grow

you should know what are you talking about, before making your opinion a fact. TV contract is linked to the quality of the league and not whole world. you can read this here: (93604.14)

If for a X quality level the system gives more money than the previous season,if you maintain the same level,you'll have more money,it's logic,man

You are funny,man,really
Show me the post where I said that BB should give money to the country because of their BB population
I ALWAYS said that the system should give money for the competitivity.If the first Iceland division catch up the first Italian division,the incomes would be exactly the same,so what are you saying?
And I never said that Italian first division need a boost,you are saying the false,man
The problem is in the lower divisions,where it's not acceptable the current situation,as I said in numerous posts,but not again for population,but for the different competitivity and the different weekly balance

Please,stop saying the false and stop joking

well, you get money what you are worth. first of all as mentioned by others TV money is determined by league strength. as for arena income, it is determined by you winning and by fan bases (yours and yours opponet). I really cant see how italians are so different from other countrys. I really cant. You take in comparing contrys that have 10-20 users(and not everyone is active). how cant 50 users so much influence italian league, that has 5k users? if they 'steal' a player from someone (which is wrong saying, if someone saved money for that specific guy), from the same standpoint they buy from someone for highier price (who is probably italian, as you have 5k managers). If you train players, that have no market value, then sorry mate, you are not great manager ant maybe, just maybe you belong to lower divisions. try to cut on salarys, get solid draft and compete. BB is where only the strongest survive. I bet there are italians, that have solid profit and pretty decent results