BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 25

Season 25

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
248324.242 in reply to 248324.241
Date: 10/1/2013 5:56:43 AM
Kira Kira Koseki
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
779779
Second Team:
Yubi Yubi
So guys, about that 2-3 zone...

(62746167)

From: Jay (OTT)

This Post:
00
248324.244 in reply to 248324.243
Date: 10/1/2013 6:36:43 AM
Kira Kira Koseki
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
779779
Second Team:
Yubi Yubi
My team's not even playing that game Wolph.

But here's my counterpoint: can you prove you won't win that game by less, or even lose, with 3-2 or MtM?

Last edited by Jay (OTT) at 10/1/2013 6:39:26 AM

This Post:
00
248324.245 in reply to 248324.244
Date: 10/1/2013 6:40:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8585
Sadly , with the recent history of 2-3 zone on this game , i would say the burden of proof lies with you in this case.

From: Jay (OTT)

This Post:
33
248324.247 in reply to 248324.246
Date: 10/1/2013 6:52:30 AM
Kira Kira Koseki
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
779779
Second Team:
Yubi Yubi
Wolph you just failed a spot check.

THAT WAS AN ABBL GAME

From: Flaah
This Post:
22
248324.248 in reply to 248324.247
Date: 10/1/2013 7:22:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Thing is isolated examples shouldn't count, they are countless :)
Maybe 2-3 hadn't worked here (62743514) checking the shots of the 3 perimeter guys. Maybe 3-2 hadn't either checking the 184k PF. So it's not about counter defenses to one tactic, but specific matches when to use what isolatedly.
Nice debate here :) There shouldn't be gloomy ideas about the changes. The game is pretty entertaining and changes can always be empowered or just edited, time tells. So I'm in for experiments to make a better experience in the long run.

Advertisement