OK man you're stepping over the line!! I'm not trying to fool anybody !!!!!!!!!! I'm just simply stating what I think is true.
I didn't say anywhere in my previous posts that the macros have an advantage !! You argued that small nations have an unfair advantage, I stated that this is not true and I gave statistics from b3 history.
This is the history of B3 champions :
Italy : 1 champion - Currently has around 1850 users
Spain : 2 champions - Currently has around 1750 users
Polska : 1 champion - Currently has around 1250 users
China : 5 champions - Currently has around 700 users
Turkey : 1 champion - Currently has around 600 users
Germany : 1 champion - Currently has around 575 users
Serbia : 4 champions - Currently has around 500 users
Argentina : 1 champion - Currently has around 450 users
Latvija : 2 champions - Currently has around 300 users
Slovenia : 1 champion - Currently has around 225 users
Czech Republic : 1 champion - Currently has around 200 users
Canada : 4 champions - Currently has around 200 users
Iran : 3 champions Currently has around 50 users
Japan : 1 champion - Currently has around 25 users
Moldova : 1 champion - Currently has around 8 users
If you count all of them, it adds up to 29 B3 contests as I stated before. Now what is the limit for macros ? I mean how many users ? Buzzerbeater has 99 flags (including Utopia I think), Canada with around 200 users is the 30th in terms of user number. So if you do a simple math, you see that 24 times out of 29, the B3 champion has been from the upper third of the BB in terms of user count.
24/29 = 82.7 %
This means that approximately 8 times out of ten, the champion has been from the upper third of BB in terms of user number (The upper 1/3 in terms of population and user count)
Let's say that nations with around 500 users or more are macros, that way we have to count the champions from Serbia and the countries above in terms of user number, we see that 15 times the champion has been from a country with around 500 users or more. Let's do a quick math :
15/29 = 51.7 %
This means that on average, 1 time each 2 seasons, the champion has been from a country which is in the top 12 (if we don't count Utopia) in terms of user count.
Let's just take into account the top 10 countries in terms of user count, then we would have :
11/29 = 37.9 %
If we round it up to 40, this means that approximately 4 times out of 10, the B3 champion has been from a country which is in the top 10 in terms of user count.
Like I said above, almost 82 percent of the B3 champions are from the upper third of the BB in terms of the user count, Which leaves Iran, Japan, and Moldova as the only countries which are in the bottom two third of the BB in terms of user count :
5/29 = 17.2 %
Iran and Japan are in the middle third of the BB in terms of user count, and that leaves Moldova as the only country in the bottom third of BB to have ever won a B3 :
1/29 = 3.4 %
Now considering the above calculations, let's say that 100 B3 competitions have been held, by the math above we would have :
Almost 83 times out of 100, the champion would be from a country which is in the top third of BB in terms of user count. This mean that the country would have about 200 users or more
Almost 52 times out of 100, the champion would be from a country which is in the top 12 in terms of user count. This means that the country would have about 500 users or more
Almost 38 times out of 100, the champion would be from a country which is in the top 10 in terms of user count. This would mean that the country would have about 600 users or more
Approximately 17 times out of 100, the champion would be from a country which is in the bottom two third of BB in terms of user count.
Only 3 times out of 100, the champion would be from a country which is in the bottom third of BB in terms of user count. By current statistics, this would mean that the country would