BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 6 Changes

Season 6 Changes

Set priority
Show messages by
From: brian

This Post:
00
40617.245 in reply to 40617.238
Date: 8/3/2008 12:39:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I understand your thinking as well as I understand it from Bush Jr.

Of course you are not worried about the future of BB. You just want us to understand that what ever decision is best for You, is also best for everyone.

That's why I also think this BB will be, at the end, the "international" league between USA and Italy.

Egoistic thinking is NOT always a virtue!


I despise stereotyping and ignorance from foreigners just as much as I do from fellow Americans. Maybe you also know of Dick Cheney, and though he's far from my favorite person, he has a quote that I love to borrow for this moment.


edit: No profanity, please. Thanks.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 8/3/2008 12:44:29 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Bunter

This Post:
00
40617.246 in reply to 40617.245
Date: 8/3/2008 12:49:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Ok, sorry!

May I still ask one thing? Those teams which upgrades their league after this season will not get any benefits? Instead they will be penalized more next season than they would have, being played in their previous, lower league. Is this correct?

Last edited by Bunter at 8/3/2008 12:50:45 PM

This Post:
00
40617.247 in reply to 40617.231
Date: 8/3/2008 12:57:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
I am not suggesting different rules for different countries, since this is not necessary at all. Just implement the tax as maintenance per seat. This way you give the chance of small teams to catch up without taxing them for excess income they don't have. This way you're really taxing the source of the income and not taxing teams simply for being in a higher division.
This would have been a much better solution, and I would guess that BB* would agree on that too. However, this solution requires that you act in good time giving people time to adjust, as you will directly single out one group of managers and punnish them for playing the game according to the rules. Naturally they would be very upset with this kind of solution and it would prbably create a great controvercy.

Thus, even if your suggested solution is better on paper, I think it would create too much controvercy and therefore they had to choose another solution.

This Post:
00
40617.248 in reply to 40617.247
Date: 8/3/2008 1:15:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Thus, even if your suggested solution is better on paper, I think it would create too much controvercy and therefore they had to choose another solution.


It's def a good suggestion though, potentially better alternative to their current plan. Maybe it's something the BB's haven't considered. They have made announcements for changes in the past and then after further thinking not implemented them (GS drops for transferred players, for example).

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
40617.249 in reply to 40617.248
Date: 8/3/2008 1:23:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Thus, even if your suggested solution is better on paper, I think it would create too much controvercy and therefore they had to choose another solution.


It's def a good suggestion though, potentially better alternative to their current plan. Maybe it's something the BB's haven't considered. They have made announcements for changes in the past and then after further thinking not implemented them (GS drops for transferred players, for example).


Yes, I also agree that it is a better solution. But, it is to "apply in a rush". They could possibly make some kind of plan to gradual switch from the current panic solution to kozlodoevs solution(TM) and present this as their longterm plan.

From: Bunter
This Post:
00
40617.250 in reply to 40617.249
Date: 8/3/2008 1:34:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
^^

I agree all of those above! But isn't it a common practice that BB will make all the changes within two weeks after announcement? Without any possibility to appeal? At least that's how I've felt this.

This Post:
00
40617.251 in reply to 40617.249
Date: 8/3/2008 2:00:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Yes, I also agree that it is a better solution. But, it is to "apply in a rush". They could possibly make some kind of plan to gradual switch from the current panic solution to kozlodoevs solution(TM) and present this as their longterm plan.

To be fair, I can't entirely claim credit for this suggestion. Someone posted the suggestion to implement arena maintenance while simultaneously allowing for the possibility to tear down seats. I just thought it makes a lot of sense.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
From: Bunter
This Post:
00
40617.252 in reply to 40617.251
Date: 8/3/2008 2:05:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
To be honest, the only sensible solution for BB-team is take a Time Out, and resolve these current problems.

It's more than obvious, that this latest solution will make some kind of a chaos between all BB managers.

Last edited by Bunter at 8/3/2008 2:06:06 PM

This Post:
00
40617.253 in reply to 40617.252
Date: 8/3/2008 2:09:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
To be honest, the only sensible solution for BB-team is take a Time Out, and resolve these current problems.
The current solution is basically a Time Out as i see it.

This Post:
00
40617.254 in reply to 40617.253
Date: 8/3/2008 2:15:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Why not moving these TV-systems and player taxes for the countries that have their first leagues as a mature level. Let's others to evolve for that with old ruling!


Advertisement