BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Outside attack too strong ?

Outside attack too strong ?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125704.249 in reply to 125704.248
Date: 1/17/2010 5:24:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
It's lame to check his games of this season, since his keyplayer V.D Linde one of the best PFs in game is injured. Check last seasons games.

F.e Inside Away beats Outside Home (15672155)

(17554581) --> His OF is clearly dominated by the other teams OD, and he still manages to reach his bigman.

Another example where the opponents OD dominates his OF (17565610)

Playing against an outside team without offensive flow that also dominated his OF with a high OD (15672203)

He's playing inside most of the time, and still he's one of the best teams in the top division of Holland winning the cup twice in a row. It's not impossible.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 1/17/2010 5:45:01 PM

This Post:
00
125704.250 in reply to 125704.249
Date: 1/17/2010 5:44:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
It's lame to check his games of this season, since his keyplayer V.D Linde one of the best PFs in game is injured. Check last seasons games.

F.e (17554581) --> His OF is clearly dominated by the other teams OD, and he still manages to reach his bigman.

Another example where the opponents OD dominates his OF (17565610)

He's playing inside most of the time, and still he's one of the best teams in the top division of Holland winning the cup twice in a row. It's not impossible.

sorry, but I don't follow you here. Both games are LI vs LI and in both he has the better ratings. And in each game played in the cup last season he was by far the best team on the court.

This Post:
00
125704.251 in reply to 125704.250
Date: 1/17/2010 5:45:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
see the edit, since I knew you were gonna say this (although he still is a dominating inside team, so again it's possible). Also this are my last words at the subject, as I said before believe what you want to believe, just repeating myself isn't gonna help anyone anywhere.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 1/17/2010 5:48:34 PM

This Post:
00
125704.252 in reply to 125704.239
Date: 1/18/2010 4:21:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
If your best center was born with OD 7 or PA 6, that is something you can build a strategy on. On this level Buzzerbeater is a much richer game tactically than some voices in this thread seem to believe.

Agreed. Choosing your trainees and training them to become the players you want them to be is the part where BB really rules :)

This Post:
00
125704.253 in reply to 125704.251
Date: 1/18/2010 4:35:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Also this are my last words at the subject, as I said before believe what you want to believe, just repeating myself isn't gonna help anyone anywhere.

while I still believe that an outside focused team is easier to build, I am also trying to understand how to make the best use of LI.
For example, this team seems not care about OF at all and is still highly competitive. He did not have many tight games played lately, but a couple of them are quite interesting, for example this one (17975123). The key for him seems to be the dominant PF, one of the best in the game.

Last edited by Newton07 at 1/18/2010 4:35:38 AM

This Post:
00
125704.254 in reply to 125704.253
Date: 1/18/2010 8:33:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
He did not have many tight games played lately, but a couple of them are quite interesting, for example this one (17975123). The key for him seems to be the dominant PF, one of the best in the game.


Still a really poor shooting performance for the home team. He won because of rebounding and a great showing from the charity stripe, not because his inside tactics worked. At least, that's my opinion.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
From: Exos

This Post:
00
125704.255 in reply to 125704.252
Date: 1/19/2010 5:11:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
If your best center was born with OD 7 or PA 6, that is something you can build a strategy on. On this level Buzzerbeater is a much richer game tactically than some voices in this thread seem to believe.

Agreed. Choosing your trainees and training them to become the players you want them to be is the part where BB really rules


I'm curious why everybody thinks that big men are so horrible to train in outside skills. My 6'8'' (203 cm) SF had 2 passing pops in three weeks of training. I don't know how it works with 7' guys but they have the advantage in the inside skills. Plus the most expensive PG in the world is also 6'8'' tall (so I've been told), try it and see how it works.

Cheers, Exos


p.s. to all:
I had hoped this thread has changed into a more constructive discussion. I was so sick and tired of people listing games and others deconstructing it because on about 10 pages this yielded no real results. Please don't revert to this pattern again.

From: Newton07

To: Exos
This Post:
00
125704.256 in reply to 125704.255
Date: 1/20/2010 3:51:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
I'm curious why everybody thinks that big men are so horrible to train in outside skills. My 6'8'' (203 cm) SF had 2 passing pops in three weeks of training. I don't know how it works with 7' guys but they have the advantage in the inside skills. Plus the most expensive PG in the world is also 6'8'' tall (so I've been told), try it and see how it works.

203 is no big man. I trained a 208cm, which is still not that tall, in both OD and JR (when there was no defensive switch) and I can tell you it's a pain. For a 22-23 yo, it took me 5 weeks to pop in OD and 4 weeks JR + 3 weeks JS for a pop in JR.

This Post:
00
125704.257 in reply to 125704.256
Date: 1/20/2010 9:05:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Single position training or 2 position?

This Post:
00
125704.258 in reply to 125704.257
Date: 1/20/2010 9:34:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Single position training or 2 position?


This Post:
00
125704.259 in reply to 125704.258
Date: 1/20/2010 9:37:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Single position training or 2 position?



PHEW!!

Advertisement