BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Increase More Stars and All-Stars, decrease those benchwarmers and 6th Men

Increase More Stars and All-Stars, decrease those benchwarmers and 6th Men

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
223518.25 in reply to 223518.24
Date: 8/14/2012 7:13:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I totally agree with this, each new team should be given one "decent" trainee to begin with, probably an 18 year old $4,000 salary allstar would be fine. Instead we have the situation where most teams get 19 year old $3,000 6th men but the occasional team gets an 18 year old $6,000 superstar. Trust me as an U21 coach I have looked at hundreds of teams to see their starting players and the current situalion is totally unbalancing and unfair.

A bad idea which affects the balance of NT from small nation to one of a bigger nation.
The amount of "good" players should not be changed.

This Post:
00
223518.26 in reply to 223518.25
Date: 8/14/2012 7:37:04 AM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
763763
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
you don't like the whole thread at all? Man, really, at least 19 year old! man then you have problems, sorry man........what did you get when you started? I hate going to TL for people........anyways when you keep your player you rise in merch. Whata if your a new guy who starts off with too many bad players. then you fire them all.........you drop badly in merch. which is the bad case. So? I like it. I only had one decent guy. and hat is James Coleman. He was 19. with 4.3k salary. So a lot of teams start the season with these people. Like let's say they start at all star break. half a season training gone.

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
This Post:
00
223518.27 in reply to 223518.26
Date: 8/14/2012 7:50:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
1) TL is a main feature here, and not succeeding / using it will lead to a failure of the one who does that.

2) I can go over and see what was my initial roster (I had it for about 2-3 weeks, as I joined at the end of the season).
I don't really remember big talents there.
But what will that prove?

3) Invest (wisely) on the upcoming draft, and until then buy the players you need.
This is (general speaking) what the game is all about.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
223518.29 in reply to 223518.28
Date: 8/14/2012 8:47:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but imho just the border when a draft is called junk get moved if you raise or reduce the quality. I mean many poster in the forum won't touch even a 19yo old with good starting skills and solid till good potential. Lot of player won't get trained to the star cap anyway, and still do there work at a solid level.

This Post:
11
223518.31 in reply to 223518.6
Date: 8/14/2012 9:59:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8484
My mate scouted an entire draft there were only 13 18yrs olds rest 19yrs and only two players above 4 ball potential a waste of 100 odd so scouting points I reckon. Lucky for him he has second pick do will get a player of his choice. But know investing wisely and scouting right doesn't mean better chance at good players as most are crap

Australia NT coach. Join offsite forum for all things Australian http://forum.buzzerbeaterstats.com/
This Post:
00
223518.32 in reply to 223518.29
Date: 8/14/2012 10:17:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
but imho just the border when a draft is called junk get moved if you raise or reduce the quality. I mean many poster in the forum won't touch even a 19yo old with good starting skills and solid till good potential. Lot of player won't get trained to the star cap anyway, and still do there work at a solid level.

That is part of what I claim here.
Changing the amount will change the balance of players amount per type, and hence just moving the border of what could be called a "decent player".

This Post:
00
223518.33 in reply to 223518.30
Date: 8/14/2012 10:23:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I have actually tried drafting 19yo players when I had a late pick but all it lead to was players that wasn't worth even 10k
I had drafted two 19yo players last draft.
I have sold one for about 100K after about a third of a season, and the other is already was estimated around 250K-550K.
You expect to get a player from the draft, not train it a bit and sell him for great profit. That is very rare as should be.

This Post:
00
223518.34 in reply to 223518.31
Date: 8/14/2012 10:28:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
My mate scouted an entire draft there were only 13 18yrs olds rest 19yrs and only two players above 4 ball potential a waste of 100 odd so scouting points I reckon. Lucky for him he has second pick do will get a player of his choice. But know investing wisely and scouting right doesn't mean better chance at good players as most are crap
How did you connect all of the pieces of your claim here together?
1) Using 50 scouting points each on a draft is not wisely using but wasting way too much (IMO).

2) 19yo are rarely carry disease. They are trainable and may be worth if being trained...

3) Three ball potential are also good until some degree, although I don't like to train that type of players either.
On the other hand, on lower divisions (surely at the forth and fifth divisions), they are surely valid players (after not to much training).

4) The chance is better, because now you know which ones are (some of) the good players, and which ones (some of them) are not worth drafting. Hence it does improve your chances.
Nobody claimed you will get 100% success in case using scouting points, and it surely should not be 100% success.

Message deleted
Advertisement