BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New DT limitation

New DT limitation

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
31047.26 in reply to 31047.18
Date: 5/15/2008 12:45:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Can anyone point me to a team that is currently a DT?

Currently and currently ... some have a position as a consequence of DT.
There has been teams like (41703) that has made a strong roster from day-trading (and others like (99007)). But lately they have slowed down. The Österreich team is the winner of the Bundesliga last season and you can of course ask your self if that's because of DT?

Older than the rest ...
This Post:
00
31047.27 in reply to 31047.25
Date: 5/15/2008 12:46:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
However, for a team that has made, say, 15 sales in the last season, the sales tax might instead range from 4.5% to 30%.


first thx for the answer, it really helps us planing the season.

Nevertheless why are u saying "say 15 sales" and "migh tinstead range". Are those numbers not always the same or dont you know the exact numbers. i believe this is something which is stated in the news and in the rules.

This Post:
00
31047.28 in reply to 31047.14
Date: 5/15/2008 12:48:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225

Lets say I train PF. I sell 2 of them each season and buy 2 trainees to replace them. With the money earned I do upgrade my team e.g. 1 PG, 1 SG, 1 SF and 1 C and I also sell 1 of my former player for each position. This makes a total of 12 trades. Then may be I am going to be punished by the game engine and have 3 times 8 weeks of injury. For not being demoted I will have to replace them which will make 6 more trades (3 sales and 3 buys). I do have already 18 trades within 14 weeks without being a DT at all. So please my friendly BB-staff be somehow generous when interpreting “a couple of trades in the past 14 weeks”.


Dont forget to factor in the GS drops as well... and the fan loss when selling players...


There is something people don't consider here: first, the agent fee is really large if you resell quickly. 20%. If you have high turnover and you sell quickly, this is deadly for your income.

On the other hand, if you sell players that have been on your roster for a while, the agent fee will be, say, 10% or even as little as 5%. Even if you have a bit of transfers over the course of the season, you will still retain more money. This is where the major difference in income between traders and non-traders will come from.

This being said, I am iffy on the new changes. I am starting to feel like we're trying to kill a fly with a cannon here.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 5/15/2008 12:50:19 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
31047.29 in reply to 31047.11
Date: 5/15/2008 5:47:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
Drop the salaries then if u want make those horrible rules.

Dropping the salaries wouldn't solve the problem. Then you would just get better players in your roster and so on...

This Post:
00
31047.30 in reply to 31047.26
Date: 5/15/2008 7:28:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Can anyone point me to a team that is currently a DT?

Currently and currently ... some have a position as a consequence of DT.
There has been teams like (41703) that has made a strong roster from day-trading (and others like (99007)). But lately they have slowed down. The Österreich team is the winner of the Bundesliga last season and you can of course ask your self if that's because of DT?



Thats my point - that was THEN - when taxes were introduced and now the GS drop that seemed to do the job of deterring DT's. This new rule IMO is not necessary because there arent any (many) DT's still about...

Your 2 examples have made 3 transfers between them in May!

The people complaining are those that just judge a managers transfer history and see loads going on Nov-Feb/Mar.....

From: Jward
This Post:
00
31047.31 in reply to 31047.30
Date: 5/15/2008 9:40:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I am not really following what is really implemented, excuse my English.
Can anyone confirm this?

Starting this monday, the more transfers you make, the more tax you will pay for selling players.
Also starting from today, the number of transactions etc. will affect the previously announced GS and fan base stuff. (and we don't know the extent of the effect on fan base. i.e. how many transactions would hurt, selling which player would hurt etc.)

Anything wrong here? Thanks for clarifying

This Post:
00
31047.32 in reply to 31047.6
Date: 5/15/2008 11:13:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Well you can feel sorry for the day traders... personally I feel sorry for the thousands of new teams that are now going to be scared s@*%tless to enter the market through fear of worrying about money being taken away from them in the future...

Good bye transfer market..... only the mega players and very high potential will retain any type of value....


I feel this is an exxageration. I believe that tax will only become unreasonable when players are trading at unnecessarily high levels - that is, simply in order to make money.

And if you are making 15 moves a season - a lot of moves I should add - the tax only moves up ten percent or so to a maximum of 30 percent. If you are making those moves to improve you team then you have no worries.

Last edited by Dr. Fader at 5/16/2008 12:03:11 AM

From: -CS

This Post:
00
31047.33 in reply to 31047.25
Date: 5/16/2008 12:00:28 AM
GinaKia
MBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
can you tell me when this system will function? because my player is selling, if this system function now, it is quiet unfair because before i sell my player, i don't this function's news from BB!

From: Pieriku

To: -CS
This Post:
00
31047.34 in reply to 31047.33
Date: 5/16/2008 4:37:58 AM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
In the news, they say it will start on Monday.

This Post:
00
31047.35 in reply to 31047.30
Date: 5/16/2008 7:11:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Can anyone point me to a team that is currently a DT?

(56741)

Advertisement