Actually, Ezi (my semi-finals opponent) was significantly better than me. Ezi had all absolutely world-class NT calibre players and he especially dwarfed me at centre, power forward, and small forward. He probably had 20-30+ TSP/10 at both PF and C and his SF was better suited for this level of competition and inside matches in particular. Ezi's guards were arguably better than mine too. They both had higher IS and were similar elsewhere. Despite all this, I legitimately topped his ratings and pp/100.
My best big man was a plain 17/17/16/10 centre. Another rotation big man, and in fact an inexplicable starter in blank line-up, was a 16/15/15/4 big man with 95 TSP/10. I don't mind my SF, but he doesn't meet some NT criteria for a SF, and certainly didn't compare to Ezi's SF.
I have no idea how my team beat his team. I am mystified that my team put up better ratings than him. It is absolutely incomprehensible that my team put up possibly the best overall team ratings of all-time in B3. By strict ratings, my team was quite good. I believe, though, that Ezi and the Chinese champion (without the injuries) were better than me. Dutch Pacers probably too.