You guys have said it yourselves: people in stronger leagues benefit from more income from TV rights and more importantly, a longer cup run. People from weaker leagues have some obvious benefits on their side too. This balances things out and I believe there is no need to change the B3 system.
It isn't fight between teams form stronger leagues and weaker leagues. I suppose you badly defined the problem...It isn't only the problem for clubs from stronger leagues. It affect on all teams in B3. For example, in this season enthusiasm problem was affected on team from weaker league. I mean Canadian league is worse than Chinese. Do you agree with me?
It is very important case for B3 turnament.
It could decide who wins! Please, don't ignore it.
Moreover it's simply not logical that results from one independed turnament or league in each country can affect on international turnament. In history of basketball was a lot of so-called "turnament teams" which great played in international turnament, and recorded poor results in the league.
This balances things out and I believe there is no need to change the B3 system.
Benefits of weak and strong leagues will never be balanced. People in stronger league benefit from more income from TV rights and longer cup run, but people from weaker league can tank and easier win trophies. I think teams from weaker leagues don't need enthusiasm benefits in B3.
BTW If users from weaker league want to play in better league they can buy access to Utopia league. People from stronger league don't have to possibility to play in weak league.
B3 should be equal for every team. That's why every team in B3 should play every match with enthusiasm 11.
Last edited by kozlik4 at 1/16/2015 3:43:43 PM