BuzzerBeater Forums

You stepped over the line when you accused me of trying to fool other people !! You got what you deserved. That's number one.

Number two and most importantly, the fact that you still can't accept the simple math in front of you, just shows me the kind of person you are in real life. So don't even talk about real life.

You won't reply to me anymore because you have no answer. Facts are facts, you just chose to ignore them.

Good day to you as well

=)))))))))))

My flawed numbers ?? Please show me exactly where is it that my numbers are flawed ???

According to the number of users of the top third countries in BB, the champion should come from the top this part 88 % of the time.

but HELOOOOOO !!! This game is not a game of ODDS ! Is it so hard to understand or are you just pretending to be stupid ?

I'm sorry to talk to you like this but you seem ignorant of the facts.

This game is not a game of ODDS. A lot of different factors weigh in and effect who becomes the B3 champion. Yet, there is only a 5 percent difference between what the odds say and what has happened in the game. 5 percent is not at all a significant number. I don't get how you can make this a huge deal !!!!!!

But I ask you again, please show me where my numbers are flawed.

This isn't to say either of you are wrong but i'd be less interested in the probably number of winners from each country because there are so many other variables.

What is more interesting to me is the actual pros and cons of playing in different nations when it comes to BBB.

I simply used the numbers to reject the notion of Trainerman saying that some nations are over presented. Numbers show the contrary !

Of course there would be pros and cons to playing in different countries, macro nations get tons of high potential players each season in draft, and a lot of our youth goes to waste, but we don't cry out imbalance because of it. I have been the U21 of Iran for about 5 season now and we get very little high potential players in the draft because of our low number of users. Many of the youth go to bot teams in DIII and it is frustrating sometimes.

:D

We try our best to make the best of what we have instead of looking for a scapegoat.

BB says they are trying to make national competition more competitive by merging the nations, why not instead put the high potential players who go to bot teams in micro nations on the market ? That would certainly lead to more trained youth for micro nations, thus more competitive games

Interesting idea that, maybe acertain percent of HoF+ potential draftee could go to free agency every season. The percentage being based on number of users for that nation? Would impact the price of draftees on real teams though but sounds a good idea in theory.

Why use the odds of 1 champion ?

For example a shop wants to know how much the products make for him or her. He/she won't just look at the yesterdays sells and then conclude and interpret based on just that one day !! He/she will probably take a look at the sells of past month, even better the past year for a better outlook and view.

This is the same in here, if we are talking about the BB in whole, and we're discussing how BB should move forward, we can't just say (based on your logic):

1 guy from Moldova has won the B3:

1/20000 = 0.00005 % -----> So if the odds says that he's odds of winning are one in 20000 tries, then he shouldn't have won 1 in the 29 times the B3 have been held. And remember this is based on your logic !! So by your logic, we conclude that micro nations are over presented because he/she overcame the odds !!

That's just ridiculous ! We must look at the bigger picture and consider the numbers in whole. The overall numbers are those that I presented you. And the numbers say that the distribution of champions are not odd at all. They are pretty much as they should be. But then again, remember that this is not a game of odds. A lot and a lot more different factors weigh in and affect the outcome of every game, let alone the B3.