BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > screwed
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
Draft: Looking for Ideas
70
player DEAD
7
Helping each other
10
GM benefits
4
screwed
38
Turnovers?
9
Game 3?!?
3
Rewards
6
Money ?!?!?!
6
Game Engine
5
Substitutions
9
Height
5
relegation
3
Game Ratings
6
dead transfer market
21
Arena-Changes
5
Assistance
1
Differentiation PG/SG and Cent...
2
New to BB Forums?
1
Countries
3
<
>
Favorite Folders
screwed
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
BB-Forrest (2)
Edju (2)
NRaider (1)
brian (1)
raonne (1)
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor (5)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
brian
This Post:
0
268.27
in reply to
268.26
Date: 7/10/2007 2:48:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
This is all very good feedback, especially the note about how zonal ratings and tactics.
It seems you have come to answer the issue I had. First, what was up with the coaching ratings. This appeared to be answered as my team took poor outside shots and lowered the coaching rating. Thus, the issue comes to how the engine for some reason decided not to take advantage of inside scoring at the same time I told my team to focus inside.
I do understand this a beta, so pressing my issue was a bit of both being confused/frustrated at the loss and trying to provide feedback for you guys to work with. I'd say it's a good sign that I'm bringing this all up as I do enjoy playing this game. Otherwise, I'd not even waste my time.
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
BB-Forrest
To:
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor
This Post:
0
268.29
in reply to
268.28
Date: 7/10/2007 3:19:43 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
8
I did look at those games.. and your analysis... and i whole heartedly agree the coaching rating doesn't seem to make any sense... the results do.. but the coaching rating does not. I think i have some ideas about what to do about this.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
BB-Forrest
To:
brian
This Post:
0
268.31
in reply to
268.19
Date: 7/10/2007 5:55:51 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
8
so i ran your game like 4 more times as a scrimmage in the test universe.. i found that in all 4 cases you destroyed them. For example.. in one game you went 61-97 from the field (3-13 from 3) and won by 40.
so as far as i can tell that was just a fluke... I'll have a talk with charles about it.. one of the large outstanding issues is to evaluate the variance of the game and decide if its enough or not enough. We don't want the better team on paper to always win.. just cause that would be no fun ;)
Edited 7/10/2007 6:21:54 AM by BB-Forrest
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
NRaider
To:
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor
This Post:
0
268.33
in reply to
268.32
Date: 7/10/2007 10:09:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
no they would have lost 1 game, to me in the Cup finals...if you dont believe me check out the friendly him and i played, 109-106, winner! give me my trophy punk!!!!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
NRaider
This Post:
0
268.34
in reply to
268.33
Date: 7/10/2007 10:24:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303
I'm pretty sure judging by the records he was referring to the 95-96 real life Bulls.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
raonne
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
268.35
in reply to
268.34
Date: 7/10/2007 10:36:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16
hahahaha, i loved this
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images