BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Trades?

Trades?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Borobia
This Post:
00
321.27 in reply to 321.26
Date: 7/24/2007 2:53:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Its tough to think a way to make trades possible, because when you open it you have many many many possibilities, and when you have many possibilities, you have that many chances to cheat unfortunatelly.

This Post:
00
321.28 in reply to 321.27
Date: 7/24/2007 3:14:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Allowing trades would really put a hamper on the transfer market.

Also, as Forrest said, being only able to trade within a certain salary range also defeats the purpose of trading in the 1st place, especially when a mechanism (the TL) already exists for transactions of this nature.

There's just too much foul play that can occur with trades for them to be worth the minimal benefit that is derived from allowing them.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: raonne
This Post:
00
321.29 in reply to 321.28
Date: 7/24/2007 9:26:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
well, I don't agree. If I have a awesome jump shooter and nobody at that moment has money to buy one, i'm stuck with him. However, people that don't have money could still trade great players.

But anyway, I'm done with this. I give up. We'll never have trades... Not because it was impossible, but because people were to scared or defensive to think together for a solution.

It would have been great, but whatever. This game will be great anyway...

(someone can close this thread if they want)

From: brian
This Post:
00
321.30 in reply to 321.29
Date: 7/24/2007 11:39:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Say, for instance, I have a really good inside player that I'm stuck with. Raonne needs a big guy, and I need a good outside shooter. So..what if we both list them at our valuation (which is prob higher than anyone would pay on the market now) and then we both bid on each others player. Everyone still gets a chance to buy that player, and w/o any "fair market values" on players to compare against, is that breaking any rules?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Vikman

This Post:
00
321.31 in reply to 321.30
Date: 7/25/2007 12:48:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I remember that use to happen in hattrick. What if you bid on his player and he doesn't bid on yours? If it is on the TL, there is no rule that he has to bid on yours even if he said he would.

This Post:
00
321.33 in reply to 321.32
Date: 7/25/2007 2:29:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I think the transfers list will work itself out as the game matures and people start to sell trainees. We need to let the market establish itself and see what happens from there.

blabla?

From: raonne

This Post:
00
321.34 in reply to 321.33
Date: 7/25/2007 5:21:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
domenico, I will drive you to Vikman's house so you can do your thing...

This Post:
00
321.36 in reply to 321.35
Date: 7/25/2007 4:07:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Correct