Any team should be allowed to play all games TIE if it wants to, but should be punished if tries to arrange mutual TIE. For example, someone offers me to play mutual TIE, I report about it and opponents get punished (with 0:25 loss and some money penalty - or anything else) so it would be great for teams who don't want to play mutual TIE. Everything should be decided in game not through collusions
Any team should be allowed to play all games TIE if it wants to, but should be punished if tries to arrange mutual TIE. For example, someone offers me to play mutual TIE, I report about it and opponents get punished (with 0:25 loss and some money penalty - or anything else) so it would be great for teams who don't want to play mutual TIE. Everything should be decided in game not through collusions You are right in the point of mutual TIE, I was focused on a little different thing. Well I think that is possible to avoid mutual TIE itself. Try to look at that thing by this way - how many times anybody usually get by "accident" TIE game on both sides? The probability that you will TIE and the other team do the same is quite small. So what if there would be implemented a simply rule that if you play more than (lets say) 3 games in a month like this, the next match with TIE on both sides would be for your teams effort setted automaticly before it starts, like you would play NORMAL.
I don't think it would work...I see a lot of games played TIE in my country, some managers play tie almost exclusively...and some teams play TIE against teams they know they can't win even with CT, and those teams will also play TIE all the timeso that way people would get punished for choosing a strategy for their team.
In my opinion should be punished somehow these which play TIE TIE TIE all the time like I suggested above.