BuzzerBeater Forums

actually this rbings up a good point, on frequency of games. Your question assumes that D-league plays 3 games a week, or same numbers as normal league.

So maybe D-league should only be once a week? Just like a Private league?

In reality, if you have an 18 year old, and you are in the cup and a top league, you probably wont want to train him and as such, you wont keep him.
With a D-league, this would give you an opportunity to train that 18 year old.

It means as an experience BB player and trainer, im given an opportunity to train a young player, without compromising my Div I team.

Other people training their 'star' potential $4k salary 19 year olds in the D-league, will mean that when they sell them, there will be more skill-variety of 20/21 year old players going around.

I havent answered your question, but, I would imagine a scenario whereby the D-league is 3 games a week, would be a bit much.

I think the prices of the "middle class" players is already very low. If you introduce this d-league addition, then this only adds free slower training. This acts as extra income (for high div teams) and will negate the income lower teams would make training 3 players simultaniously to sell to higher leagues after 3 seasons or so.
There is a downside to training (especially in the upper leagues), but I think that it is good. Think about it. If there was a way to train effectivly and win in the higher division (like micronations can), play the cup with full strenght and the league with full strenght with no downsides. It would be a pointless game. The game is about choise. What will you focus on and what are you willing to sacrifice to get what you want.
Currently the lower league teams train the younger years of the player, then they sell them to higher league teams, who continue their training. This gives the lower league teams money to strenghten their teams and keeps higher league teams income lower, with the constant need to replace their veteran (old) players. Sure the micronation divI teams can make huge profits and do not have the problem of cash, but in bigger nations a lot of the teams are keeping their teams near income cap, to remain competitive in the top league.

i agree with everything you said in that response except for one thing.

I actually believe that the prices of middle class players to be too high. (maybe we are talking about different kinds of middle class?)
by middle class, i would define as players who have a salary between $10k and $$20k
and i believe they get sold for too much. AND I also believe that they are not very multi-faceted when it comes to skills. Very hard to find a good backup SF for between $10k and $20k salary. You end up essentially going for a SG or PF.

thats my experience anyways. So i think if the league does come in, prices will come down, but i dont think by that much. BUT we would get the benefit of more variety of skills in 'middle class' players.

This point does concern me though, and you raise a good issue here

This acts as extra income (for high div teams) and will negate the income lower teams would make training 3 players simultaniously to sell to higher leagues after 3 seasons or so.

and the follow on i totally agree with.
so maybe there needs to be a solution to this? A workaround? any ideas? How could we make this work?

Very hard to find a good backup SF for between $10k and $20k salary.

What makes you think, that with this change, everyone instantly starts to train SF's?:) I just don't feel there is the need for any extra free training at the moment. People have been training like idiots for long now (that's why BB's eventually released cross-training, to even out the skills and limit pumping up those 2-3 skills). It's always better to try to train those hard positions yourself. Unless you want to pay 3-6mil for a decent SF, like I did. It's always the best to do the thing few people are doing. If everyone says, draft is crap and I will not invest, you invest 10k a week and pull out profit every season. When everyone starts to put money into scouting, because you are making profit every season. It's your time to stop investing (if you situate high in the league table).
If everyone starts to train SF's from now on. The prices of every other spot will go up in a few seasons and SF prices will drop dramatically.

I used the SF situation as an example only. Obviously everyone wont just train SF.
The extra training that would come out of the D-league would not just affect high-potential players, but all potential players at all positions, in all leagues.
So what you might find are the following scenario's:
- Team A draft's good potential player which fits into his training plan, but already has too many trainee's. Lets new trainee play in D-league and receive training. Normally, would just fire him or sell him for peanuts.
- Team B draft's 3 'Star' potential players. Instead of firing them, decides to put one of them through the D-league. They receive training, as opposed to just being dumped. After 2 years he has a 20 year old star potential player who has a $10k salary, which he puts on the market for sale.
- Team C drafts an 'All-star' potential player who has atrocious stats in out of position area's. Normally he would fire him, because he is useless, and not only that, this player doesn't fall into his training plan. Instead, this user puts him through the D-league, and the player gets out of position training for a few years. After 2 years, he has a kind of player that is very rare in the league market at the moment. IMO.

So its that Team B and C scenario, whereby teams just fire their draftee's which would A) Lead to them training them and giving the market more variety, (particular situation C) and also
B) Players become more interested in the draft. I think this is the key message for the D-league idea. Current draft is a mess, and if there can be more options given to user's with their draftee's, then that part of the game would improve and become more fun.

Hey Shoei

yer good points. Let me clarify a few.
At this stage the D-league would economic free. The only cost incurred would be for the salary of the players that are playing in it, which, the idea has been suggested that only 3 league players... So in essence, max 3x 18-21 year old league players, which you might already have anyways. So the economic expenses would be minimal.

I like your example of O'bannon, adam morrison, eric montross, kwame brown, micheal olowakandi etc etc Yes these guys did become first round rejects after a few seasons. But when comparing NBA to BB, if you go through your league's previous draft, you would probably find about 5-6 of them are still playing. (FYI, my league had 6 guys from First round still being played). In the NBA, this number does not tend to be that low. Maybe after a few seasons yer, not after 7 weeks.

So one of the idea's of the D-league would be that teams would be more likely to keep some of their draft picks, and train them into useable backups/starters for lower leagues.

how many nba players out there on every year being drafted eventually develop to stars versus to how many become regular starters versusthe bust and role players and those who didnt get renewed.

- I would say there is a much higher level of rookie's being retained in NBA, than there is in BB.

that is why i never invest money in rookies at all.

-Maybe a D-league would change your view on this?

but i think with the current low prices, training player isn't that valuable already, if you now train them "with cost"(at least the salary or like initial suggested with a fee) the avaible player will be even more but the need is still the same. This will make training there own player even less valuable, don't knw if you get them the effect you like.

At the beginning of the game we trained, most player just because there wasn't valuable target, now we have aconstantly I just say the average player get trained four season, and one or two position training is the most common options, then we already need 1 player every season for training. But we don't loose player and the finished product are often cheaper, then the initial drafted player through the ton of player who stay in game through free agency. So i don't think, that especially with slower training, the d-league would be good for the market since it just raise the amount of avaible player even more maybe the starting skill decline of the first trained player with high potential will help this trend else i would think that the cut off of the free agency will help more.

something ive realised is that everyone has different opinions about the current state of the market. Not everyone is on the same page with regards to whether ceratin players on the market are 'cheap, well-priced, expensive' or wehther or not there are a variety of skilled players. Its very opinion based.
I come at it only from my own personal perspective and history of looking/buying players, which may be different to other peeps.

Otherwise i do understand wher you are coming from. Whats the point in having 4 trainee's if you are already struggling with 3?
Maybe look at that scenario from a different angle. Eg: I only have 1 trainee at the moment that i really care about. All my other training pretty much goes to waste. I can afford to buy another 18 year old or 2 to train, but i dont know how I will fit him into the minutes given my current league-cup standing. Imagine if you could do that without jepordising your league/cup?