BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
93604.288 in reply to 93604.286
Date: 7/24/2009 7:00:11 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
I don't understand the relation of new GE and training ...

This Post:
00
93604.289 in reply to 93604.288
Date: 7/24/2009 7:05:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Usually in scrimmages, you don"t play your best players and focus on training and gameshape by managing your minutes. So the results in a scrimmage isn't the best indication on whether or not the GE is realistic.

This Post:
00
93604.290 in reply to 93604.289
Date: 7/24/2009 7:23:57 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
I don't mind, whether is GE realistic. I simply would like to know, how it works and for this purpose it not necessary to play with best players.

This Post:
00
93604.291 in reply to 93604.290
Date: 7/24/2009 7:30:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
It's hard to know how the GE works in scrimmages when a lot of teams play unusual line-ups such as playing players out of position for training. I should have put it differently instead of saying "best" players.

This Post:
00
93604.292 in reply to 93604.291
Date: 7/24/2009 7:33:14 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
But unusual setups are also very useful for understanding new GE, especially zone defenses.

This Post:
00
93604.293 in reply to 93604.292
Date: 7/24/2009 7:40:58 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
Some fact of 1st quarter of my PL match. I played 3-2 Zone, opponent played Look Inside.
Opponent C had 3 inside shots - 1 with no defender, 1 defended by PG (ID 6) and 1 defended by SG (ID 6). Where was my C (ID 12) all the time?
If the zones defences works like that, Man to Man will be even much more useful than it was up to now!

This Post:
00
93604.294 in reply to 93604.293
Date: 7/24/2009 8:02:59 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
N of3 is not convincing I think if you look overall the vast majority of inside shots will be defended by interior defenders. Plus there is never no defender just sometimes the commentary doesn't list it.

This Post:
00
93604.295 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/24/2009 9:39:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Sometimes there should be no defender. Breakaways, defensive mixups leading to wide open jumpers, great screens, faking a guy out of his jock and going to the hole... All possible instances of there being no defender. Just sayin...

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
93604.296 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/24/2009 10:50:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
in my short overview the numbers of blocks decreased - i believed it hsould be more importent to make thehigh salary reasonable the lockers get?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/24/2009 10:51:42 PM

This Post:
00
93604.297 in reply to 93604.296
Date: 7/25/2009 2:04:26 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Having run extensive testing I can assure you blocks are on average more frequent. Plus help defense makes blocking more important

This Post:
00
93604.298 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/25/2009 2:39:39 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
I know, that 3 events is not convincing, but it takes time to make more stats, because for me there is no other chance than watch whole the match. Later I'll put here complete stats of my PL match.
If there is no defender in commentary I can't know who really defended ... so for my stats it's like no defender.

Last edited by rwystyrk at 7/25/2009 2:40:07 AM

Advertisement