BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Feedback, questions, general discussion.

Feedback, questions, general discussion.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
12.29 in reply to 12.28
Date: 4/30/2007 9:44:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
I love that my team doesn't shoot a single three, and thrilled that my opponents attempt them.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
12.30 in reply to 12.29
Date: 5/1/2007 1:47:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
oh we will see tommorrow.

This Post:
00
12.31 in reply to 12.27
Date: 5/1/2007 3:57:17 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
we'll ease up on the focus.. but you should also look at your teams strengths, as the normal offense will focus where you have good matchups.. so if your best place to look was inside, and you said to focus inside.. you weren't going to look very much anywhere else.. and even if you did... it probably wouldn't be a good look.. so you wouldn't take it.

This Post:
00
12.32 in reply to 12.31
Date: 5/1/2007 3:59:26 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
yeah.. you have strong inside.. vs average outside.. so your team generally looks at more inside shots anyway... plus the real reason you won the game was the 2-1 rebounding advantage.. cause you weren't a dominating shooting team.

This Post:
00
12.33 in reply to 12.1
Date: 5/2/2007 2:21:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
is there any particular reason the commenter has fallen asleep in my last 2 games? Can I buy him a cup of coffee by any chance so i could tell what the score was during the game?

This Post:
00
12.34 in reply to 12.33
Date: 5/2/2007 3:10:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I've just woken him up. Some of his commentary might be a bit wonky, but I'll make sure he gets enough sleep for the next game.

This Post:
00
12.35 in reply to 12.34
Date: 5/2/2007 3:58:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Good deal, that guy has been messing with my head for a bit, I figured he just plain didn't like me for some odd reason. Don't remember ever pissing off a commentator before...

This Post:
00
12.36 in reply to 12.35
Date: 5/2/2007 4:08:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
You know these artistic types. Maybe he was having a bad hair day.

This Post:
00
12.37 in reply to 12.32
Date: 5/2/2007 5:32:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
yeah.. you have strong inside.. vs average outside.. so your team generally looks at more inside shots anyway... plus the real reason you won the game was the 2-1 rebounding advantage.. cause you weren't a dominating shooting team.


Right, but even the most inside-centric team attempts a few threes.

My team failed to do so again tonight.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
12.38 in reply to 12.37
Date: 5/2/2007 6:52:32 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
hmm..we'll take a closer look. We definitely did reduce the skew of the inside look. You might experiment and just go with a balanced attack, we don't want the factor to be so small that a team that natural gravitates outside can't switch its behavior to focusing inside.

but perhaps we just need to rethink we structure these tactics alterations altogether...

This Post:
00
12.39 in reply to 12.38
Date: 5/2/2007 6:57:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i played looked inside an shoot 1 3 pointer even though i was loosing by 50, by the way it was the las shoot of the match.

Advertisement