BuzzerBeater Forums

You have the starting five with all +100k salary players,that you will not have problem to sell in any condition on the market,and they will always have an high value related to the conditions of the market

Not really, my players have also dropped heavily in value over the last few seasons. Players I bought for 8m/7m just a few seasons ago have recently just sold for half that amount along with being trained. Really, that doesnt matter to me, because market sales are all relative if you are re-investing them into market purchases.

The low market sucks for teams that are trying to stockpile money. The low market is awesome for teams that saved up money seasons ago, held it, and are getting awesome players for a fraction of the price. There are winners and losers in this market. The bulk of the teams are neutral as they sell players and buy new ones with the proceeds.

Woo-Hoo, after 14 seaosn we learned that the solution to win is to have the luck to do the day-trading when the market flourish and save money for the period when there's deflaction
F*** programming the growth of your team

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 10/18/2010 4:30:52 PM

The more you write, the more it shows how little you actually understand about the game...

Expain me why,and I could give you the reason,if i find your arguments good
Don't do it,and I will not listen you

Sorry to disturb you

So what do you think about the near future? I thought we had the lowest prices last season but I was wrong.
Then do you think BBs have to correct this situation or is ok?

This economy is quite interesting for me I did bad choices so for sure I'm in trouble until something will not change but today no one day trader can make easy money and is hard to find the best compromise between salary and competitivity.
From the other side the market is frozen and this is not "fun" and, personal opinion, training seems not so good as in the past under the point of view of entrance when you sell a player.

Just like in every other thread, people have explained you the situation (not the jersey shore guy:D). You just disregard the facts and keep yanking things out of context. You keep complaining about things that actually are already irrelevant. If selling prices drop, buying prices also drop. It's pointless to complain about someone who has been collecting funds, at the same time others were having success with their bought players. If someone was too late at selling their trained-to-sell trainee (perhaps even overtrained), it's nobodys fault but their own. They took a risk when they started training for the market.

If selling prices drop, buying prices also drop

Let's say that the market value of the players drop by the half
half of 8 milion is 4 milion
half of 1.5 milion is 750k

If a top player drop his value,his manager will however have enough value to act on the market.What kind of player you can buy with 750k,instead?And the drop in the middle-level players market is also stronger,because there are much much more mid-level players than top players,so for supply and demand economic theory,the drop will be much more harsher for that category of players than for top players.

They took a risk when they started training for the market.

This is a pretty stupid statement.I can start training players to have them in my team in the future,and then I can change my plans and have to sell them because I start a rebuilding process or I decide to maintain in the my team a player instead of another.
Every player can go on the market,no matter what were the starting training plans of his managers,so the risk should be the fact of training players?Your logic seems to me pretty weak,man

Let's try to have a clean discussion, please.
People who is not interested in the thread are not forced to read it or take part in the debate

Let's try to have a clean discussion, please.
People who is not interested in the thread are not forced to read it or take part in the debate

So you just want a black and white answer? This is wrong or this is correct? There's no room for someone who thinks "This discussion is futile but will nonetheless be repeated a hundred times?"

And what do you mean by "clean"? I didn't post anything that would be commonly deemed offensive?

And what do you mean by interest? I read all 30+ posts in here. That doesn't convey interest?

Last edited by kLepTo at 10/18/2010 6:28:37 PM

Well, you have a different point of view about how to use the transfer list, for example(just an example, nothing personal) your team, the only reference is this:

You sold for: 5 935 100
Youd bought for: 10 500 700

----------------------------------------

-4,565 600

I can understand you like the prices are lower, since you buy more than sell. Also you are a manager that made only a few transactions so you dont really care about the TL since is not important for you.


But for managers who have an acurate timing of the transfer list, who made some money from their good training are really worried about the transfer list. All those managers who are good at training and made good profits, because they always trained right, having +5M-10M in benefits on their transactions are at least now disappointed to see how low is that TL.

I made on the past, 6,5M of benefit from the TL, but now i find the TL is so ridiculous low than i prefer to keep my players than selling for nothing.


PD1(In general question): Why the FA are still on the TL?...


PD2: You also give frequently your PoV about TL, but i find you used it only a few times, have you scout it every week? Probably not.


PD3: You say there is no discussion since you think your ''truth'' is the good one(so no motive to argue), but on the economy there isnt only 1 truth, you should know that if you know a bit about economy :)

Last edited by Marot at 10/18/2010 6:57:57 PM