BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 3-2 zone

3-2 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
220015.29 in reply to 220015.28
Date: 6/14/2012 6:16:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
Even if you think that the positives outweigh the break downs, like Manon, it's helpful if you're aware of them for when you choose this tactic.
This, I can agree with.

As for 2-3 zone, just consider one thing: If you're up with 2 mins left, your opponent start chucking up 3s regardless of his tactics. Against any other tactics (incl.3-2) it takes any chances of come back away, but against 2-3 zone... Well, I actually haven't seen a team playing 2-3 zone leading too many times :)
You are both right and wrong. The opponents do start jacking threes, but I have seen some teams in B3 and league level win using 2-3 zone. I'm too lazy to look it up, though.

This Post:
00
220015.31 in reply to 220015.28
Date: 6/15/2012 3:49:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
the thing with 2-3 is that you had to be old school with your SF, must dudes play it with a guard like SF who weaken you inside and the 2-3 hurts you outside.

The 3-2 Zone fit better to the normal teams, but imho you don't need special player to play both of this tactics. 1-3-1 is maybe the zone where you should have a special PF.